IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSEC] minutes part 2

RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com> Sat, 20 December 2008 20:42 UTC

Return-Path: <opsec-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: opsec-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-opsec-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D0463A695E; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:42:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618083A695E for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:42:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.951
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.951 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.952, BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JzkPeb7M9qLo for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:42:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vms173007pub.verizon.net (vms173007pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.7]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A7C3A67DD for <opsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:42:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.30.20.71] ([72.84.80.181]) by vms173007.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KC70005Y03KRE61@vms173007.mailsrvcs.net> for opsec@ietf.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:40:37 -0600 (CST)
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 15:41:47 -0500
From: RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>
In-reply-to: <7C362EEF9C7896468B36C9B79200D835487C9AE0@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com>
To: opsec@ietf.org
Message-id: <FB1B605F-01AC-4EA9-B9BC-79A4EE4BF580@extremenetworks.com>
MIME-version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
References: <EC3F7E1D-F7C8-484A-A0C0-1A25E79AD86E@extremenetworks.com> <92c950310812161620j7d8aaa16m553940edadbe6d8f@mail.gmail.com> <12201E12-8A0B-4FBE-95A9-5C8B23DA46EC@gmail.com> <92c950310812171704x76e374bbv1bd74d74f5ca755b@mail.gmail.com> <C2E84336-3E35-4D68-BD81-3E222CD681F2@gmail.com> <92c950310812180801i10ac5f07l4ed58c87778ca9ba@mail.gmail.com> <7C362EEF9C7896468B36C9B79200D835487C9AE0@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] minutes part 2
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: opsec-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: opsec-bounces@ietf.org

On  18 Dec 2008, at 23:03, Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote:
> There was an implementation of RFC 2154 based on Gated but there are  
> no known deployments of the same. I had a brief exchange with Sandy  
> (SIDR chair and author of this RFC) and she too isn't aware of any  
> deployments.
>
> Cheers, Manav


I am aware of deployment of RFC-2154 within the USG,
as noted before on this list.

Foundry Networks' online data sheet also claims
that they implement RFC-2154.  (I have not tried
to check all vendors' data sheets.)

Ran

<http://www.foundrynet.com/products/enterprise/adv-conv-edge/fi-edge-xe.html 
 >
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email