Re: [OPSEC] minutes part 2

R Atkinson wrote:
> 
> On  23 Dec 2008, at 14:22, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>> Just to be clear here... since the context disappeared some messages
>> back...
>>
>> RFC 2154 is what is being referred to here?
>>
>> Do we have deployments or operational experience to draw on?
> 
> Joel,
> 
> I am told there is limited use of RFC-2154 within US DoD.
> 
> I gather (from the URL provided earlier) that at least one
> commercial router vendor supports it.
> 
> Note that I have not and do not propose that this WG recommend
> RFC-2154 for general use at this time.

I agree...

>  It would be unusual
> to recommend an experimental status RFC for widespread use.
> I suspect many folks would agree with that.

As a foil for a thought experiment it's  fine.

We continue to demonstrate that the problem space has not been fully
exhausted.

> I have proposed, and continue to believe, that a document talking
> about issues with IGP authentication mechanisms (and there are
> lots of potential issues with IGP authentication at present)
> ought also include analysis and discussion of RFC-2154.

noted

>  If
> RFC-2154 has issues, those would be useful to know in detail,
> and such a document would be an appropriate place for such
> information.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Ran
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
> 

_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec