IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSEC] minutes part 2

"Bhatia, Manav (Manav)" <manav@alcatel-lucent.com> Thu, 18 December 2008 23:12 UTC

Return-Path: <opsec-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: opsec-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-opsec-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CDCE3A68AE; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:12:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FDA53A63EB for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:12:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dWqj1Z9bSm6Y for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:12:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smail5.alcatel.fr (smail5.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.27]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28AF03A68AE for <opsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:12:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB04.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB04.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.64]) by smail5.alcatel.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/ICT) with ESMTP id mBINCcoP016991 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:12:38 +0100
Received: from INBANSXCHHUB02.in.alcatel-lucent.com (135.250.12.35) by FRMRSSXCHHUB04.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (135.120.45.64) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.311.2; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:12:38 +0100
Received: from INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.250.12.56]) by INBANSXCHHUB02.in.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.250.12.35]) with mapi; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 04:42:36 +0530
From: "Bhatia, Manav (Manav)" <manav@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "Darrel Lewis (darlewis)" <darlewis@cisco.com>, "rja@extremenetworks.com" <rja@extremenetworks.com>, opsec wg mailing list <opsec@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 04:42:36 +0530
Thread-Topic: [OPSEC] minutes part 2
Thread-Index: Aclfs/clIhIpv118Rhio/6cdbJm1uwBTlZWwABH4ktAABuZC0A==
Message-ID: <7C362EEF9C7896468B36C9B79200D835487C9AB7@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <EC3F7E1D-F7C8-484A-A0C0-1A25E79AD86E@extremenetworks.com><77ead0ec0812160927j77bf42c6mbccef8ccf55d1e16@mail.gmail.com><90F75653-21D6-4D2B-9472-52F2BDF7510D@gmail.com> <7C362EEF9C7896468B36C9B79200D83547FFA2C1@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com> <60C4A248E730F249990993E3B9BD44D806E3789A@xmb-sjc-218.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <60C4A248E730F249990993E3B9BD44D806E3789A@xmb-sjc-218.amer.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 155.132.188.13
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] minutes part 2
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: opsec-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: opsec-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Darrel,

> If this is a more general discussion about network filtering of
> ospfv3/ESP packets and intra-enterprise firewalling, then yes, I guess
> it could be problematic.

Yes, it is this case. Firewalling OSPFv3 is a pain with ESP.

Cheers, Manav

> 
> -Darrel
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email