IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSEC] FW: minutes part 2

Michael Barnes <mjbarnes@cisco.com> Sun, 28 December 2008 08:55 UTC

Return-Path: <opsec-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: opsec-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-opsec-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 784A83A6AF3; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 00:55:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35AED3A6AF3 for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 00:55:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m-X87+j-IJZu for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 00:55:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 608523A6405 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 00:55:03 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.36,291,1228089600"; d="scan'208";a="220516613"
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Dec 2008 08:54:53 +0000
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mBS8srtB010292; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 00:54:53 -0800
Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBS8srr3014534; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 08:54:53 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.187]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 28 Dec 2008 00:54:53 -0800
Received: from [10.21.147.221] ([10.21.147.221]) by xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 28 Dec 2008 00:54:52 -0800
Message-ID: <49573EDA.90800@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 00:54:50 -0800
From: Michael Barnes <mjbarnes@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Smith, Donald" <Donald.Smith@qwest.com>
References: <49518B19.4050803@cisco.com> <22B4D402-A1C8-4834-B031-A8B213158E8C@mimectl>
In-Reply-To: <22B4D402-A1C8-4834-B031-A8B213158E8C@mimectl>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Dec 2008 08:54:52.0665 (UTC) FILETIME=[F2B84E90:01C968C9]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=366; t=1230454493; x=1231318493; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=mjbarnes@cisco.com; z=From:=20Michael=20Barnes=20<mjbarnes@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[OPSEC]=20FW=3A=20=20minutes=20part=202 |Sender:=20; bh=qxAkHW9dDl4oE7FS48wa90ALDV5rl/H9a5b11oYWdm0=; b=MsDWZL2GgKTFpSbriGniVFFRygz2jS1Ow3ALdQ1ilEjP4BeVLXjx4cPHN5 kYBGQ5crCIObfDaQTrjzlBIEPSoOMTyB0gWxRPqaEOiWmHSa5/wGsUMZm3Nb JFw8z3PTJk;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=mjbarnes@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; );
Cc: "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] FW: minutes part 2
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: opsec-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: opsec-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Donald,

GTSM was implemented some time ago and is already available in some 
releases.

Regards,
Michael

Smith, Donald wrote:
> Michael, hopefully that will come with some type of TTL restriction ability (GTSM). Without it the encryption function becomes a good "slow path" dos vector.
> 
> 
> Donald.Smith@qwest.com<mailto:Donald.Smith@qwest.com>
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email