Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982)

Christian Huitema <notifications@github.com> Sat, 24 November 2018 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99CC3130E43 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 10:28:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.46
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8oZ_fmhLHwVZ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 10:28:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-3.smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 835C2124BE5 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 10:28:48 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 10:28:47 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1543084127; bh=oSJopj94i6R0/+oPLWP1FJyzt43GN/eghGOmgAA5ZIw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Jvky8c1XorgruA+qQFZs7A8M3ZGKFKR4C11qGNHnWW9fB26Wvw+CjZYp4uM9AmTJZ cLBM9nAPe0qXcIU/otJRf92w2hU3H7yRj51ToXMHYvAt7CoBNi+mLTuVuycjIOULSV KfF6mtb4gOTBnTPdKsGbRYkUTep0hnWyGEuo9JHw=
From: Christian Huitema <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abfc2d156158298c7439e9ca851e61d289759b85c892cf0000000118115a5f92a169ce169265bd@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982/review/178058565@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bf9985f7e283_1a623fd98ead45c410196c6"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: huitema
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/8XhYIf6hg3eOIWF24DvQKCkwiWY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 18:28:51 -0000

huitema commented on this pull request.



> @@ -235,11 +235,19 @@ Implementations SHOULD allow administrators of clients and servers to disable
 the spin bit either globally or on a per-connection basis.
 Even when the spin bit is not disabled by the administrator implementations
 SHOULD disable the spin bit on a randomly chosen
-fraction of connections.  The selection process should be designed such that
-on average the spin bit is disabled for at least 1/8th of the connections.
-
-When the spin bit is disabled, endpoints SHOULD set the spin bit value to zero,
-regardless of the values received from their peer. Addendums or revisions to
+fraction of connections.
+
+The selection process SHOULD be designed such that
+on average the spin bit is disabled for at least one eighth of network paths.
+The random choice SHOULD be dependent
+on the source and destination addresses of the path,
+so that the spin bit is consistently enabled or
+disabled for repeated use of the same path.

My preference would be to make a policy decision to spin or not at the connection level, that is flip the coin based on the initial pair of addresses. But then, we also need a paragraph stating that the initial value of the spin bit is randomly computed for each path in a connection. If the policy decides to spin, this value will spin. If not, it will stay constant, to zero or one. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982#discussion_r236050063