IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Fri, 30 November 2018 00:37 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DCE9127133 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 16:37:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.46
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QeMhIMVtRKvv for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 16:37:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-7.smtp.github.com (out-7.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDA44124408 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 16:37:23 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 16:37:22 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1543538242; bh=efbHuXw8J5JxievjXyeW8xzosY3Mxm6Jgt7C6Ss7Wcg=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=U7bPevl7x7OlSBOUpnlwpVA0VxhnmPl7iF7tMQrsZrKHe/4Z4R442fpGkEsF1bTjo Da9JIizX3o3LXJkk5DzhXVdElDk/4gwvueEVibOGm1U1LdI2M3IomROPmPWaDsQXwy ki6PmBtx3K3yYBsiGilvUjWCzt/rLNUEm8C8dbzo=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abaa1697d5eacfa793da47a67361454b623eaad50a92cf000000011818484292a169ce169265bd@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982/review/180080621@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c008642d29f6_12363f7e7fed45bc577d9"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/vQe1DxK0oWolay5GjJhhn09z5Mw>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:37:25 -0000

ianswett commented on this pull request.



> @@ -235,12 +235,23 @@ Implementations SHOULD allow administrators of clients and servers to disable
 the spin bit either globally or on a per-connection basis.
 Even when the spin bit is not disabled by the administrator implementations
 SHOULD disable the spin bit on a randomly chosen
-fraction of connections.  The selection process should be designed such that
-on average the spin bit is disabled for at least 1/8th of the connections.
-
-When the spin bit is disabled, endpoints SHOULD set the spin bit value to zero,
-regardless of the values received from their peer. Addendums or revisions to
-this document MAY define alternative behaviors in the future.
+fraction of connections.
+
+The selection process SHOULD be designed such that

I think we have consensus on that.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982#discussion_r237711505

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email