Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982)

mirjak <notifications@github.com> Tue, 27 November 2018 16:26 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C3812D4E7 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 08:26:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.46
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19jqrVT79HIP for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 08:25:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8930126BED for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 08:25:58 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 08:25:57 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1543335957; bh=Jho/LkX2oECJVkAgAKMZB+rXK0m6dlOJZYuqlG/Mq1o=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=hGN6qU7+nGHr6ytci8qWK7A1GD8ojyRR0aSY4AKNNmqLDc4jxVwj9a72Qq6njtmWc iag1Q6nsaGUqLX8KU+aobiwR/jdUsIau27N6Y7CVU5NRx3cAR5rppVSlDJBxUiSm+u 2t/SqQoVBCgxmfsxxX5bhIxlOccd7w7+v/nrnVHA=
From: mirjak <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab5448bb9ef31186529cd6c35ad0f145006cf52ec092cf000000011815321592a169ce169265bd@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982/review/178880369@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bfd7015cf14e_11e53f8914cd45c41658d2"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mirjak
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/MyU0o3hXpi4roykw-SEQvYbwUYA>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 16:26:01 -0000

mirjak commented on this pull request.



> @@ -244,11 +244,8 @@ on the source and destination addresses of the path,
 so that the spin bit is consistently enabled or
 disabled for repeated use of the same path.
 

Sorry, I was on holidays and couldn't comment on the discussion above, that why I reopen this conversation. Also Brian is on parental leave, so he was also not able to comment. What I'm saying is that text should not have been removed. We can have more discussion about SHOULD and MUST.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982#discussion_r236742053