Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Wed, 14 November 2018 00:56 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46718130DFE for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 16:56:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SUpi3Kl7tDnX for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 16:56:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o9.sgmail.github.com (o9.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 728DE130DF5 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 16:56:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=54pfVHVNfPJfXGBaMQ1c408qe0g=; b=bZbfRyWXOQLa+gQr vpUc8BTA0gK/kyxiof6cnqfWig0fvXRb67Kp+zuDmQZco19gM5L3PFMZOsQHOCgp fjzG4OHmZVGjvYpURCJJz26o+cbn/RyoEX/tv9k5CL3wxWGHF0TBx8YZvWwD7UvA IRGmpkQlPhFJzpm1KIJWGV22En0=
Received: by filter0280p1iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0280p1iad2-30774-5BEB72B0-F 2018-11-14 00:56:16.570623303 +0000 UTC m=+607727.285679273
Received: from github-lowworker-63e61ec.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.36]) by ismtpd0007p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id by6EVCPnRZK1SyCh7E3Csw for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:56:16.513 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-63e61ec.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7872A08DA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 16:56:16 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:56:16 +0000
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab80a24e45c4a5edd5b14171c22a81025a69235d6992cf00000001180334b092a169ce169265bd@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982/review/174657747@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5beb72b077839_6ebe3f82672d45b4125534"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1GcvwrOVuOA1Iq8D822N2ZDxQn/0SAIk/HBO 5dSn16DJVDp/ICcNMexqc+1chsoBxaYxhtOVQEBJEUk5cJKOJjQ4plZSmcbP8+nfpuxM5RTIaJlTig DtBfsaeAIAG+1fREjuOcno3D7OT/iILpfxtLOzJuAj8zGqyXvj+doHm6Rg==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/AexmLkv1AvZ-4YLXNOjk_QEmutE>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:56:20 -0000

mikkelfj commented on this pull request.



>  
-When the spin bit is disabled, endpoints SHOULD set the spin bit value to zero,
+The selection process SHOULD be designed such that
+on average the spin bit is disabled for at least 1/8th of the connections, or
+1/8th of the paths when doing migrations. The random choice SHOULD be dependent
+on the source and destination addresses of the connection,
+so that the spin bit is consistently enabled or
+disabled for repeated connections between the same addresses.
+
+When the spin bit is disabled, endpoints SHOULD set the spin bit value to
+a constant value randomly chosen to be 0 or 1,
 regardless of the values received from their peer. Addendums or revisions to

> disabled for repeated connections between the same addresses.

Isn't this the part that is hard to coordinate when multiple processes handle different connections - though you could share a hash key.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982#discussion_r233280194