Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982)

Lars Eggert <notifications@github.com> Wed, 28 November 2018 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D61F41276D0 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 12:52:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.46
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eHE6XFWUiwzR for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 12:52:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-11.smtp.github.com (out-11.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33260126DBF for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 12:52:49 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 12:52:48 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1543438368; bh=3zhZrA7tfhHGq195j28fu3oIpE7d3JeJlb5LkW1Q/Is=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=l5twUNlvXLE6xd+kiejSXQXlgDnSnu2TPvjRTB27/U2nVMB427fnwfilKWFKl5QwH it2y6uwuUH9k/pp/5QprKftKyQxCZjXkWltvqXxx2zRk4ca2Tvu3Bj1E7co2+iI88X Yny/+2IKpUmBpGTGfVx2Q+zvgi1orbLVF/4fNW4I=
From: Lars Eggert <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4aba89c6c6aad55b5c22cb649a14a29bcf196146ab792cf000000011816c22092a169ce169265bd@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982/review/179510922@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bff002034024_67c73f825c0d45bc1945bc"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: larseggert
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/gFq3REt8OOUol3PJYQ8aaqIGVZQ>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 20:52:51 -0000

larseggert commented on this pull request.



> @@ -239,14 +239,17 @@ fraction of connections.
 
 The selection process SHOULD be designed such that
 on average the spin bit is disabled for at least one eighth of network paths.
-The random choice SHOULD be dependent
-on the source and destination addresses of the path,
-so that the spin bit is consistently enabled or
-disabled for repeated use of the same path.
+The selection process SHOULD be externally unpredictable but consistent for
+any given combination of source and destination address/port. For instance,
+the implementation might have a static key which it uses to key a pseudorandom
+function over these values and use the output to determine whether to
+send the spin bit. The selection process performed at the beginning
+of the connection SHOULD be applied for all paths used by the connection.

"1/8th of network paths" is unclear - how can an endpoint identify paths? I think what is meant is 1/8th of *peers*

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982#discussion_r237255687