Re: [Rfced-future] Fwd: [I18ndir] I18ndir last call review of draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-11

[Peter Saint-Andre <[e-mail]>]

On 3/1/22 6:54 PM, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
> Hello Peter, others,
> 
> On 2022-03-02 09:02, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> 
>>
>> Although I agree that internationalization issues can be especially 
>> thorny, I wonder if this document should say something more generally. 
>> (For instance, another example might be YANG modules, which AIUI in 
>> the past have caused some adjustments to the editorial process.)
>>
>> This could be defined in a new RPC responsibility within section 4.3, 
>> such as:
>>
>>     8. Conferring with relevant experts regarding particular kinds of
>>        content when publishing RFCs or helping to define policies for the
>>        Series; such topics might include internationalization and
>>        localization [RFC 7997], graphical formats such as SVG [RFC 7966],
>>        and structured content such as YANG modules [RFC 7950].
>>
>> Peter
> 
> This looks like a very good direction. However, I'm slightly concerned 
> that this includes "or helping to define policies for the Series". I 
> think the RPC should reach out to all the help it thinks it needs or can 
> benefit from. What I would definitely want to avoid is to create the 
> impression that input on I18N,... to the policy definition process has 
> to come, or is mainly coming, via the RPC.

Oh, that's certainly not the intent.

Perhaps "when publishing RFCs or contributing to the work of the RSWG".

Peter