Re: [Rfced-future] Fwd: [I18ndir] I18ndir last call review of draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-11

[John C Klensin <[e-mail]>]

--On Wednesday, March 2, 2022 06:55 +0100 Eliot Lear
<[e-mail]> wrote:

> 
> On 02.03.22 01:02, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> 
>> Although I agree that internationalization issues can be
>> especially  thorny, I wonder if this document should say
>> something more generally.  (For instance, another example
>> might be YANG modules, which AIUI in  the past have caused
>> some adjustments to the editorial process.)
>> 
>> This could be defined in a new RPC responsibility within
>> section 4.3,  such as:
>> 
>>    8. Conferring with relevant experts regarding particular
>> kinds of       content when publishing RFCs or helping
>> to define policies for the       Series; such topics
>> might include internationalization and      
>> localization [RFC 7997], graphical formats such as SVG [RFC
>> 7966],       and structured content such as YANG modules
>> [RFC 7950]. 
> 
> 
> That is one reason to have an RSCE.

Independent of the other issues and text -- which I think is now
under control...

While I agree that it is a reason to have an RSCE, assuming the
RSCE will have even moderate levels of knowledge in one, much
less several, of those very specialized areas calls for a much
more in-depth description of requirements for the RSCE position
than is in the draft and that I think was the plan the last time
this was discussed.

best,
   john