[Rfced-future] Boilerplate nit [I18ndir last call review of draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-11]

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 02 March 2022 00:51 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C06A3A0A83 for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 16:51:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ppvUIi44ra4p for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 16:51:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x436.google.com (mail-pf1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::436]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 896563A0A7E for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 16:51:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x436.google.com with SMTP id p8so411725pfh.8 for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Tue, 01 Mar 2022 16:51:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9FDv3vGx/jUWWyMUOZFZLugNVSKQouXPW8I/crJYRGs=; b=BCtFiak5kV4vG9c4Re1JEnx1a83+xYWC9ZXJ+RhNZHb80ioE/0cImyZ7PBU2DW/EHq Ugec3uD6lx3js8Uzr4k0vrf6Xh9YEJdaolJMH2uL0Pjwc7npeceOn67PH8m+sKrSCAWD IUvxM8Cv7dxc+tSc+pQB+IHOM+I4w9tnRz3HWh0NtCc942N7VpIvkgT68BDsBPGoHccS GX6Uo5NBrAll/2eGFhQKEA9dysfhd2FeXrKpEW6lXci85yjAOmFvDyXg3fxGMrQQOLBx nYzyl97K8WP3wOA9FBPDGOZRaLFcDUFIY+rBQ1/LPpXu2ycrE9D9FrjDR6aM6zQO2Qzh 0tNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9FDv3vGx/jUWWyMUOZFZLugNVSKQouXPW8I/crJYRGs=; b=7gof5sIF6VTfN3kEdFE4kYVdXEmy5JU3CxdvIUHdLMraP6qXQxaXdyHvsMYcrq/Gqw E3BqATbKI60vmsml17BEcsUoTIwjyDjSnjJyoS0IcWR1B171iH1RkKksntOPebptaGXl 67cj8mTE9ywZvcQxfifHCGjAXvwi2Oooe11QgzfG2RrvR0INNhXXsiWBOiPKI+We4RSg VrZUt4yJ3ofY0gpTO6/mntIgniFEr0807BrRk2Rnm2TYRKzniXek++9kFz59gWtv00xl Jc8WHV3oTKleTm5AOsyMWAmmMg4aKqhaoACffRnBH8cvRdxMTnk1nVi02Gn9vMLLGClN 7YdQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533NPSqazWL0aiDBlwGLsB5UPPaqfWb73pnjtWYR4lPZEDT3Af4K /fPRmmUsX2PPQL9YyUHZUig=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzRilfv7T1LOepSXuwTvNY5ZSepAdSAlw3gdjjdXuaXPjZkBYH5L2MLO4Iw1JBLZNN/kB+Cyg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:8c5:b0:4c7:f9a5:ebc6 with SMTP id s5-20020a056a0008c500b004c7f9a5ebc6mr30771088pfu.34.1646182285390; Tue, 01 Mar 2022 16:51:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:1005:b501:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:1005:b501:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bd35-20020a056a0027a300b004f63bca32e7sm1629851pfb.208.2022.03.01.16.51.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 01 Mar 2022 16:51:24 -0800 (PST)
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, rfced-future@iab.org, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
References: <164579171829.24424.11911193648846995596@ietfa.amsl.com> <D68950D9-7010-46FA-8E3C-6B1C5D6AA734@kuehlewind.net> <9188ee67-2362-7fc7-931b-4fcde832d706@stpeter.im>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <770d5315-c3f2-9220-cd72-7e269f71f75c@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2022 13:51:21 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9188ee67-2362-7fc7-931b-4fcde832d706@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/f7_-YaJoZf6hpww1MRaOmN9M8GU>
Subject: [Rfced-future] Boilerplate nit [I18ndir last call review of draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-11]
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2022 00:51:28 -0000

On 02-Mar-22 12:36, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
...
> 
>>> I think I might have asked that question somewhere already, but is it
>>> clear
>>> where April Fool RFCs go? The most recently published April fool RFC 
>>> (RFC 8962)
>>> says: "This is a contribution to the RFC Series, independently of any
>>> other RFC
>>> stream.  The RFC Editor has chosen to publish this document at its
>>> discretion
>>> and makes no statement about its value for implementation or deployment."
>>> Looking around a bit, this seems to be part of the template of the
>>> Independent
>>> Stream. Will it be in the RPC's discrecion to publish such RFCs in the
>>> future?
>>> Essentially, the "RFC Editor" is now mostly just the RPC, and in this
>>> case, the
>>> text looks a bit strange, not only for April fool RFCs.
> 
> While I acknowledge that the text looks a bit strange, I don't have an
> easy suggestion for making it less strange.

Shouldn't the Independent Stream boilerplate actually say:

"The Independent Submissions Editor has chosen to publish this document at their discretion..."?

But that's a fix to RFC7841 that seems out of place in *this* document.

     Brian