Re: [Rfced-future] Boilerplate nit [I18ndir last call review of draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-11]

["Martin J. Dürst" <[e-mail]>]

Hello Brian, others,

Please see below.

On 2022-03-02 09:51, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 02-Mar-22 12:36, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> ...
>>
>>>> I think I might have asked that question somewhere already, but is it
>>>> clear
>>>> where April Fool RFCs go? The most recently published April fool RFC　
>>>> (RFC 8962)
>>>> says: "This is a contribution to the RFC Series, independently of any
>>>> other RFC
>>>> stream.  The RFC Editor has chosen to publish this document at its
>>>> discretion
>>>> and makes no statement about its value for implementation or 
>>>> deployment."
>>>> Looking around a bit, this seems to be part of the template of the
>>>> Independent
>>>> Stream. Will it be in the RPC's discrecion to publish such RFCs in the
>>>> future?
>>>> Essentially, the "RFC Editor" is now mostly just the RPC, and in this
>>>> case, the
>>>> text looks a bit strange, not only for April fool RFCs.
>>
>> While I acknowledge that the text looks a bit strange, I don't have an
>> easy suggestion for making it less strange.
> 
> Shouldn't the Independent Stream boilerplate actually say:
> 
> "The Independent Submissions Editor has chosen to publish this document 
> at their discretion..."?
> 
> But that's a fix to RFC7841 that seems out of place in *this* document.
> 
>      Brian

Agreed on both points.   Regards,   Martin.