Re: [Rfced-future] Fwd: [I18ndir] I18ndir last call review of draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-11

["Martin J. Dürst" <[e-mail]>]

Hello Peter,

On 2022-03-03 00:19, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 3/1/22 6:54 PM, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
>> Hello Peter, others,
>>
>> On 2022-03-02 09:02, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Although I agree that internationalization issues can be especially 
>>> thorny, I wonder if this document should say something more 
>>> generally. (For instance, another example might be YANG modules, 
>>> which AIUI in the past have caused some adjustments to the editorial 
>>> process.)
>>>
>>> This could be defined in a new RPC responsibility within section 4.3, 
>>> such as:
>>>
>>>     8. Conferring with relevant experts regarding particular kinds of
>>>        content when publishing RFCs or helping to define policies for 
>>> the
>>>        Series; such topics might include internationalization and
>>>        localization [RFC 7997], graphical formats such as SVG [RFC 
>>> 7966],
>>>        and structured content such as YANG modules [RFC 7950].
>>>
>>> Peter
>>
>> This looks like a very good direction. However, I'm slightly concerned 
>> that this includes "or helping to define policies for the Series". I 
>> think the RPC should reach out to all the help it thinks it needs or 
>> can benefit from. What I would definitely want to avoid is to create 
>> the impression that input on I18N,... to the policy definition process 
>> has to come, or is mainly coming, via the RPC.
> 
> Oh, that's certainly not the intent.
> 
> Perhaps "when publishing RFCs or contributing to the work of the RSWG".
> 
> Peter

That would be fine with me.

Regards,   Martin.