IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rfced-future] Fwd: [IAB] I18ndir last call review of draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-11

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Thu, 03 March 2022 03:06 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B853A10E3 for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 19:06:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TBvolN0bRHJd for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 19:06:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA3D73A10E2 for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 19:06:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1nPbnQ-000ChM-4c; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 22:06:28 -0500
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2022 22:06:23 -0500
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, rfced-future@iab.org, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <5C8E2753644329CDF00158B8@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <6cfb203e-5d6a-81cb-3fc6-3dfd97c0808d@gmail.com>
References: <164579171829.24424.11911193648846995596@ietfa.amsl.com> <D68950D9-7010-46FA-8E3C-6B1C5D6AA734@kuehlewind.net> <9188ee67-2362-7fc7-931b-4fcde832d706@stpeter.im> <5718207C4063BFA2300BAF8C@PSB> <6cfb203e-5d6a-81cb-3fc6-3dfd97c0808d@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/Tzt-PiBbd9rSy8r0ks5DwRl7GfI>
Subject: Re: [Rfced-future] Fwd: [IAB] I18ndir last call review of draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-11
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2022 03:06:41 -0000


--On Thursday, March 3, 2022 08:57 +1300 Brian E Carpenter
<brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> "RFC Editor Function" is used in other drafts too. I think
> that dropping this phrase would have many repercussions and we
> should just keep it.

In case it was not clear, I agree.  I just think that a
definition --probably a deliberately vague one-- in the model
document might be helpful.

    john

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email