Re: [Rfced-future] Fwd: [IAB] I18ndir last call review of draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-11

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 01 March 2022 21:07 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAAE63A0E8E for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 13:07:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.111
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.111 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=stpeter.im header.b=CBhpRSaR; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=gswkea0S
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f7yqD9z28zfM for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 13:06:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23C783A0E71 for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 13:06:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B005C01BB; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 16:06:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 01 Mar 2022 16:06:56 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stpeter.im; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; bh=l88b9qo6cIHQ9P opTsJW45TAObtuybrZKcu3//3ZpEA=; b=CBhpRSaRcuCrHysMMintkDWkrbrhR8 BIxa7ztSRY3xRYAA5tcthxZPdVZBo+1gMvLvTJBuNzYr9z8KPTlozTpf/zVoOHX0 CEchsgC6w9RZ6NLrV8jtwS1tdJE4m9lF6rk0VKAzyMHi2wrQi1iQ6fsY/sYWX85k z41yRp8ZTds9rNFcIahY3CfdP4/iOUR5PX9UDFD+yyVB4nOcq+mi1Sha2wZZF8/K KG4NyxeJtBMWoSScY+iUbVtHP9v6g9AnM+isObimGVOIy+kT/DkUTkKlBR4ebC7I JSB+I6H0CuW9WdCYrldnNeMnFvj+k6kvsArMIx0ufXFV+zqPqQm2PIVA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; bh=l88b9qo6cIHQ9PopTsJW45TAObtuybrZKcu3//3ZpEA=; b=gswkea0S M5lIIwzXxYKQqqjP42imyyAiZm9SdA+VgrbTtO6YQzG+2QBKoSFdy7w+UYAd8Fgr 1boYXJQP3EpyJINE3aWi5dbblum9MsU3RK7pTYn8SdhpTkJq2ZXkZM2XhwRyvQFk zpgCAUVY+ZhpQ0XFY2BnHHv4GXTQl2e4mzJJaojzDEG+1E8zHydixT29MFiA94Ru WI1F9xwQRyp0RtEO4Dp+GUgV6Rwze7/8UimeRkrOaVF3wGf5kUnFufpLoNa9p3e2 FCr52/WHnHHaCkjYbWljwsNPuGueqTAr/dBzp6JOdSRcRtDhWtg4yVPrB0CsEGE4 u2/LzcouommKjw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:8IoeYgcmcbvravjwMABQlrWu3V4eU9KoaRpRUHq8M2ap3oeXVzr8zA> <xme:8IoeYiOXwd92kQRggSzuTt3hI8-7lnsfoTQk8qF5vV8WtEJfiA5f2peUYd8QdhcSz o183bokBWTPUqhmUw>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:8IoeYhgk29jfKnfh1Ha4NxbLtVJgihPXxsa89anzkaDurcZAn5NIizmL5NpUDwZ8ZS0KTvzlgeqTW5MSmhrW1Cavmu7QgbvbqsIIlik>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddruddtvddgudegvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefkffggfgfuvfhfhfgjtgfgsehtkeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefrvght vghrucfurghinhhtqdetnhgurhgvuceoshhtphgvthgvrhesshhtphgvthgvrhdrihhmqe enucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevtdfgteetgfffveehtedvudegudfgleevfedtleevtefg feeggffgfeeludekheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehsthhpvghtvghrsehsthhpvghtvghrrdhimh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:8IoeYl9av5IJGCqRCrOSHdTwvjgH8uMl2HNwNDyY6QV186vrs88efQ> <xmx:8IoeYsuYglRtvNxwfPIiWlpA7EQa9PaL2Bp2vgOuCSjnE8NGir7xhg> <xmx:8IoeYsEM7La1JxZ9UO8Brc2NbyeQpstSGAG_YwkortN7HrWJuPIDgg> <xmx:8IoeYuLXh4xccDmeWizONYUvf0wDdQsuK2WR2yVbfMSX59z0gFAMdw>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 16:06:55 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <7147fcf6-ad16-a929-a34f-6f99f48754fa@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 14:06:54 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, rfced-future@iab.org
References: <164579171829.24424.11911193648846995596@ietfa.amsl.com> <D68950D9-7010-46FA-8E3C-6B1C5D6AA734@kuehlewind.net> <5631b70e-51c4-fb85-a521-9740d8874c31@lear.ch> <7f46c71f-65af-f470-47f7-bb96d5827d39@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <974fc6b1-33f0-938f-5a9f-6ee071c30590@lear.ch> <1c660211-cbb8-5e39-5195-c9f79f27807a@stpeter.im> <39d03ae7-b77b-725b-23a8-4a66cf4e3b29@gmail.com>
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <39d03ae7-b77b-725b-23a8-4a66cf4e3b29@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/mtFnVfxp7bzC5gZr33ZEShpIGB0>
Subject: Re: [Rfced-future] Fwd: [IAB] I18ndir last call review of draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-11
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 21:07:03 -0000

On 3/1/22 12:37 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 02-Mar-22 08:15, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> ...
>> Well, we could tweak it as follows:
>>
>> OLD
>>
>>      *  Voting on approval of policy documents produced by the RSWG shall
>>         be delayed until the vacancy or vacancies have been filled, up to
>>         a maximum of 3 months.  If during this 3-month period a further
>>         vacancy arises, the delay should be extended by up to another 3
>>         months.  After the delay period expires, the RSAB should continue
>>         to process documents as described below.
>>
>> NEW
>>
>>      *  Voting on approval of policy documents produced by the RSWG shall
>>         be delayed until the vacancy or vacancies have been filled, up to
>>         a maximum of 3 months.  If during this or any subsequent delay
>>         period a further vacancy arises, the delay period should be
>>         extended by up to another 3 months.  After the delay period
>>         expires, the RSAB should continue to process documents as
>>         described below.
>>
>> But this would introduce the possibility of an infinite delay period,
>> which seems suboptimal even if highly unlikely.
> 
> Which iirc is exactly why we decided on the current text. I don't
> agree with the proposed change.

Yeah I don't like it either - I just wanted to make it clear what the 
alternative was.

Peter