IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] H.261

Stefan Slivinski <sslivinski@lifesize.com> Sat, 23 November 2013 02:48 UTC

Return-Path: <sslivinski@lifesize.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE26D1AC499 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:48:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m5AkFoC47Wjq for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:48:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na3sys009aog120.obsmtp.com (na3sys009aog120.obsmtp.com [74.125.149.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A8F9B1AC448 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:48:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.lifesize.com ([207.114.244.10]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob120.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUpAXhOTyhNtmDNkf6N4JsMuIpcwQBfpI@postini.com; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:48:37 PST
Received: from ausmsex00.austin.kmvtechnologies.com ([fe80::edad:d9e3:99d1:8109]) by ausmsex00.austin.kmvtechnologies.com ([fe80::edad:d9e3:99d1:8109%14]) with mapi; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 20:40:12 -0600
From: Stefan Slivinski <sslivinski@lifesize.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 20:40:11 -0600
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] H.261
Thread-Index: Ac7n8fVWUD+fxfRFRNGaGRX5W+QD+QAAuNSw
Message-ID: <7949EED078736C4881C92F656DC6F6C130EA9E6769@ausmsex00.austin.kmvtechnologies.com>
References: <528F9DAD.3030300@googlemail.com> <7949EED078736C4881C92F656DC6F6C130EA9E66DE@ausmsex00.austin.kmvtechnologies.com> <528FAAA8.8060807@googlemail.com> <7949EED078736C4881C92F656DC6F6C130EA9E66FE@ausmsex00.austin.kmvtechnologies.com> <528FB79F.8090405@gmail.com> <7949EED078736C4881C92F656DC6F6C130EA9E670F@ausmsex00.austin.kmvtechnologies.com> <528FBD13.5040801@gmail.com> <528FD429.7090002@nostrum.com> <528FDE5E.5080301@librevideo.org> <CE523335-0146-4FA5-A735-1EB4A8B3F1EF@apple.com> <20131123003548.GD3245@audi.shelbyville.oz> <529006BB.609@nostrum.com> <7949EED078736C4881C92F656DC6F6C130EA9E6760@ausmsex00.austin.kmvtechnologies.com> <52900FDB.3030803@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <52900FDB.3030803@nostrum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] H.261
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 02:48:47 -0000

This isn't specifically in response to anything you have said, this thread is about H.261, I'm simply addressing arguments made in favor of H.261 as the single MTI and the problems that will arise

-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Roach [mailto:adam@nostrum.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 6:16 PM
To: Stefan Slivinski; rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] H.261

On 11/22/13 19:42, Stefan Slivinski wrote:
> Just for fun, let's play out the H.261 scenario as the great savior of webrtc that some claim it is...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adam Roach 
> ...
> I'm 100% confident that we could convince Cisco to serve up RPMs...


Stefan: This is the second completely non-sequitur response you've sent to my emails over the course of five minutes. I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish, but I don't think it's productive.

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email