Re: [rtcweb] H.261

[cowwoc <[e-mail]>]

On 26/11/2013 10:30 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) wrote:
> When I go to http://www.librevideo.org, the top headline is "Google Chrome dropping support for H.264, will support only open web codecs in the future" which seem, ah, a little out of date. I think the http://www.librevideo.org/blog/2010/06/14/mpeg-la-answers-some-questions-about-avch-264-licensing/ article is also a bit confused about the current state of MPEG LA license terms for 264 AVC pool. I do get they MPEG LA terms can be confusing at times but lots of people have figured it out. If people have questions about specific use case I'm glad to try and get them answers.

Sure:

 1. If I recall correctly, someone asked for a more concrete definition
    of a licensing "unit".
 2. On a related note, if my application is downloaded once but
    installed 5 times by the same end-user, how many units is that?
 3. I asked for the ability to license multiple units at a time so we
    deploy images and applications without a separate plugin/download
    process.

Thanks,
Gili