Re: [spfbis] WGLC: draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14

Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com> Wed, 17 April 2013 02:43 UTC

Return-Path: <dotzero@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91EA321F8E62 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:43:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1lmFEXUslQUD for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com (mail-lb0-f169.google.com [209.85.217.169]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F65421F9697 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:42:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id p11so1169582lbi.14 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:42:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=0Pqk6BH7iS8Yj55vbDmTjZDxPI6m6x5MAi6Gm72Tdew=; b=NFrJKZAxYylha0+QRrBoLqr4xA/dPyCoqvxI5Ctfv1vWxEFTWKl1ZfGX4djDv3rUnf Lt2AII8EfSJ7lH29WVqO7AaXLdNgS6q6RRyTuiJ8E7uQHiQxr1gv/sNFFxIUHD/QV6RK 8bor2JkZBRZ9rh3hrvi0sChmyqBbPXQmDCVrXT57UMolJz+UsZJxMZcuTScvhN0vkgqi uGLfj3msU79akdg5YrWSBZ12vOI8VPQukOiZCW9uUIpCkwYFgjKb35xO+mQ8+124DIEK ypVfmHsL+n8cfNO9asq9JvSvRUX3GN4b+H3eke9Gs6fqWF01pDRVp1h6Jd4Mqa1HhVEa Bzzg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.170.7 with SMTP id ai7mr2637213lbc.42.1366166564829; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.72.166 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7FE87BAF-B202-4CD5-B7BA-EDABE151E142@eudaemon.net>
References: <20130409062431.GK24624@mx1.yitter.info> <CAJ4XoYd2r7=Vd3Ge4JZie=Hz6+JupDR-OkuSRzRkyuk+5KHrKA@mail.gmail.com> <7FE87BAF-B202-4CD5-B7BA-EDABE151E142@eudaemon.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 22:42:44 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJ4XoYegUT5WRmD_OuimM2Rzx9FBrbhMH2vqkAQx-7o3gnuVeA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com>
To: Tim Draegen <tim@eudaemon.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: spfbis@ietf.org, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Subject: Re: [spfbis] WGLC: draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 02:43:02 -0000

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Tim Draegen <tim@eudaemon.net> wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2013, at 10:08 PM, Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've reviewed the draft and have one "nit" and one question/comment:
>>
>> In the Abstract the use of ADMD should be followed with
>> (ADministrative Management Domains)
>>
>>   Email on the Internet can be forged in a number of ways.  In
>>   particular, existing protocols place no restriction on what a sending
>>   host can use as the "MAIL FROM" of a message or the domain given on
>>   the SMTP HELO/EHLO commands.  This document describes version 1 of
>>   the Sender Policy Framework (SPF) protocol, whereby an ADMD can
>>   explicitly authorize the hosts that are allowed to use its domain
>>   names, and a receiving host can check such authorization.
>
> Oh dude!   Get out of my head!   I'm reviewing the document (about 5 minutes in) and this was my first note!

At least what I found is relatively minor in the greater scheme of
things. Reading the whole thing thoughtfully is so different from
going back and forth on individual items.

Mike