IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] WGLC: draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14

Scott Kitterman <spf2@kitterman.com> Fri, 10 May 2013 16:54 UTC

Return-Path: <spf2@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713C321F8E5B for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2013 09:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.361
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.361 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.238, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id avdYVNIJ55pG for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2013 09:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout02.controlledmail.com (mailout02.controlledmail.com [72.81.252.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4967921F8B64 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 May 2013 09:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout02.controlledmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout02.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC1B20E40FC; Fri, 10 May 2013 12:54:19 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=2007-00; t=1368204859; bh=QQfx1do6GzlHJjfXQCf6U93ctF9cmhYXmAooCk4aEpY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=P/U8JQyRpYJKLbR8FAIwf4ekk+9SGM5PWeLbEabiJW/F4Q/RyDOonpynmJ5KH/V53 d2U1noDhs0qB33gSMk5V3gezh9MWCa9yNVNg6E8l4BYoVn3c4P+J5K3ejD2jrOBcmr N42Twi1/zOPddej0dRiioXcDA06jfnTE1vIEJHU8=
Received: from scott-latitude-e6320.localnet (static-72-81-252-21.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout02.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 37FA420E40C2; Fri, 10 May 2013 12:54:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <spf2@kitterman.com>
To: spfbis@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 12:54:18 -0400
Message-ID: <3835527.VgQNxOy8dD@scott-latitude-e6320>
User-Agent: KMail/4.10.2 (Linux/3.8.0-19-generic; KDE/4.10.2; i686; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZdecQJmJCeoA5rm4dt8ACkny7=2spFkrPOz7-qhnGT=g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20130409062431.GK24624@mx1.yitter.info> <518CC3BC.3090602@tana.it> <CAL0qLwZdecQJmJCeoA5rm4dt8ACkny7=2spFkrPOz7-qhnGT=g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Subject: Re: [spfbis] WGLC: draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 16:54:25 -0000

On Friday, May 10, 2013 09:37:09 AM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote:
> > On Thu 09/May/2013 19:55:26 +0200 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
> > 
> > wrote:
> > >>>    macro-letter     =  %x73 / %x6c / ...
> > >> 
> > >> No, wait.  Do we really want that?
> > > 
> > > We do if current implementations generally do only lowercase macro
> > > support.  If they're case-insensitive, then what's there is fine.  It's
> > 
> > my
> > 
> > > impression that %{S} isn't valid to most implementations.  If I'm wrong
> > > about that, then I withdraw the suggestion.
> > 
> > I agree the case (in)sensitivity can easily get overlooked.  Yet, the
> > syntax is the same.  Currently, the paragraph that specifies URL
> > escaping makes no reference to any grammar rule, but we could rewrite
> > it as:
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> Whoops, I completely missed the thing about uppercase macros are URL
> escaped.  I withdraw the suggestion.

Excellent.  Sometimes procrastination pays ...

Scott K

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email