Re: [spfbis] WGLC: draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14

Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com> Wed, 17 April 2013 02:08 UTC

Return-Path: <dotzero@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8030221F8E7C for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:08:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QDe9PdyVH1kB for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f173.google.com (mail-lb0-f173.google.com [209.85.217.173]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A50421F8E62 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id w20so1138322lbh.4 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=bNwklTc3BEEq5q0Mw8rSyBpzxEJi4f981dyqKMlnwi4=; b=hENFlYC9n8vqd/SZtW29MHXARjk/2gladG0Hj92rfZFXiTZolHHVOZt1BzzUB8DYKQ xI16KVclL5CoBDx+//Om1bqkUrDv2FVL2qjwmAgSEr5q+s3l3ipw8qy0vHo9Ck+/8Ras Y+4zVdpQ7VBbMv9jmib3LCSf4bRhrrdOCPVAK1Y1OMToEoTBRmML3aRMYGaRMrN3LRhy BgyIklEvTExqixgvtY6paUj5GgGFdUFs+EkSLQk3IG2rTB5CxYWTSH9/sp32kdbN+5o8 uvsoUA7W/9Tcnj2dWuM5jVDaQwe2raWKVnBqUtl2XMhmmrV3x4WAvGfdYSZACBE+qrnB OppQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.45.37 with SMTP id j5mr2475308lam.9.1366164492423; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.72.166 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130409062431.GK24624@mx1.yitter.info>
References: <20130409062431.GK24624@mx1.yitter.info>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 22:08:12 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJ4XoYd2r7=Vd3Ge4JZie=Hz6+JupDR-OkuSRzRkyuk+5KHrKA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: spfbis@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spfbis] WGLC: draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 02:08:14 -0000

I've reviewed the draft and have one "nit" and one question/comment:

In the Abstract the use of ADMD should be followed with
(ADministrative Management Domains)

   Email on the Internet can be forged in a number of ways.  In
   particular, existing protocols place no restriction on what a sending
   host can use as the "MAIL FROM" of a message or the domain given on
   the SMTP HELO/EHLO commands.  This document describes version 1 of
   the Sender Policy Framework (SPF) protocol, whereby an ADMD can
   explicitly authorize the hosts that are allowed to use its domain
   names, and a receiving host can check such authorization.


For section 2.6.7.  Permerror

   A "permerror" result means the domain's published records could not
   be correctly interpreted.  This signals an error condition that
   definitely requires manual intervention to be resolved.

Manual intervention by whom? Does this need to be clarified?

Other than these two relatively minor details, nothing jumped out at me.

Mike


On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> This message initiates a two-week working group last call on
> draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14, our only work item.
>
> The draft has been through 14 revisions, and all open issues in the
> tracker are closed.  Please review the document and indicate any
> comments you have by sending a note to the mailing list.  If you have
> no comments, it is valuable nevertheless to learn that you have read
> the document and support its publication.
>
> WGLC will close at 2014-04-24 00:00 UTC.
>
> SM will be the shepherd for this document.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Andrew (for the chairs)
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> spfbis mailing list
> spfbis@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis