Re: [v6ops] Flash renumbering

Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si> Thu, 10 December 2020 09:15 UTC

Return-Path: <jan@go6.si>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D820D3A0B76; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 01:15:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.307
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=go6.si header.b=m+JceneM; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=go6.si header.b=qMU3xSXB
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S4_l7Jz9pIZJ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 01:15:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgate.go6lab.si (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:27e4::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 094183A0B75; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 01:15:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgate.go6lab.si (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgate.go6lab.si (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AB59810105E; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 10:15:18 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=go6.si; h=cc:cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date:from :from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to :subject:subject:to:to; s=mailgate; bh=rcSwHfyEGA36ktWM0G0ps0bw7 ToTJkXjifeMONAE/U4=; b=m+JceneMkaq/A8qKAWHp2DoVG+ez/0JFbHaWKu2m5 gFbkfYTlVz6GOQ7JR13bVBNeEsw+AJfmFD/BYKpUdQ7uijAfvLa33BCTuz2FYhir 9kzm7tRvmYCjPHp1Yuy2O8jaEP8S8aMCUUcYu3ifHUwZ62W/Lyvn3OinHfEnwxYW JgfukZeyFkiJhieRVR/ZwyU081F7OyJxM1akhDtCHsTqOokPZflc3wzMme+yHD5w AwHIMUxTFUWI3m0O5XXGzpUTvdEfhRodro2HXD0szMHHtUZQwdyItmmdk8GIXnWR lZltUcnDjDEQdcCg0HRaOURSInZ1I4L4wzVzbjQ2+cpbA==
Received: from mail.go6.si (mail.go6.si [IPv6:2001:67c:27e4::61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgate.go6lab.si (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 91070100088; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 10:15:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from haktar.local (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ee2:e08:1b03:11e2:3659:958e:28e8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "jan@go6.si", Issuer "Actalis Client Authentication CA G2" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: jan) by mail.go6.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D3AD20151; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 10:15:18 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=go6.si; s=mail; t=1607591718; bh=KqI2zN94C4nJQJS1gB3yoiUvH38D6AkTK6XNQWlsQHg=; h=To:Cc:References:From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=qMU3xSXBpQ4oB6bZ1H4l8FPq9zgeUOMhYC/J/JabvqFl+2qE8eOxbgq+UWBNiAsHY YINgtx+t7tfaGCx/okRqC8U1GJ6XO0GAA4BzXRxlVieybeNWOFlT9R7azkUMdN/SDp Sj5zlFn4NHSkgnaavFsJEyNxreulc5ZFBL0v7djw=
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Cc: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <8f964b8650cd4b619ff47aed5b07bc67@huawei.com> <7ef6cbcc-164f-383c-658b-b3c0df859535@go6.si> <1af87e24-1410-8f89-b50d-9c61694e4644@foobar.org>
From: Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si>
Message-ID: <f6c275bb-bd16-f00a-0c97-1b92f0bf9bd9@go6.si>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 10:15:17 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.16; rv:84.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/84.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1af87e24-1410-8f89-b50d-9c61694e4644@foobar.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/8Jz_beS1Ja3RVCBbPwYGBi9wVY8>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Flash renumbering
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 09:15:25 -0000

On 17/09/2020 10:05, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Jan Zorz - Go6 wrote on 16/09/2020 23:44:
>> This problem is so real in deployments where operators decided to go 
>> with non-persistent IPv6 prefix delegations that we documented it in 
>> RIPE-690 where we suggest to deploy prefix delegations as 
>> persistent/static as possible so networks/hosts behind CPEs don't 
>> suffer from this issue.
> 
> You mean to have the ISPs to provide persistent state so that SLAAC can 
> handle things better?  Only half joking here :-)

What you say - that actually sums it up quite nicely :)

"Dear ISP, please make your network topology as static as possible so 
SLAAC (in current shape and form) doesn't break end-users connectivity 
in some quite interesting ways..."

:)

Cheers, Jan