Re: [v6ops] Flash renumbering

[Fernando Gont <[e-mail]>]

Gyan,

On 18/9/20 14:11, Gyan Mishra wrote:
> 
> All
> 
> I really still feel this use case being Broadband provider PD related 
> stale prefix issue  is really a corner case for SOHO users as it does 
> not impact enterprises with manually configured stable prefix which is 
> 100% of the enterprise dual stack use case.

We have authored an entire I-D on the operational aspecs of 
flsh-renumbering (draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum), which lists the SOHO 
scenario as one of *many* possible scenarios. I wonder why people keep 
insisting on that scenario as the only one, even after we have 
repeatedly pointed to the multiple scenarios listed in 
draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum.


> 
>  From an operations impact there is considerable monetary impact to 
> enterprises if the IPv6 standards change proposed by flash renumbering 
>   does not take into account the  enterprise stable prefix scenario that 
> does not fall into this one size fits all bucket being proposed.
> 
> I am worried about adverse effects of the changes being proposed to 
> SLAAC standard that could impact enterprises.  We just need to be very 
> careful that every used case out there is accounted for.

We *are* being very careful. Could you please point at the sceneario 
where any of what we have been proposing introduces breakage? Otherwise, 
without concrete comments, it's hard to have a meaningful converstion.

Thanks!

Regards,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: [e-mail] || [e-mail]
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1