IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Flash renumbering

otroan@employees.org Thu, 24 September 2020 15:18 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E2A23A0EAE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 08:18:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3HPM7iLz64pC for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 08:18:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clarinet.employees.org (clarinet.employees.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C59723A0EAD for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 08:18:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from astfgl.hanazo.no (201.51-175-101.customer.lyse.net [51.175.101.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clarinet.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FCB54E11A6E; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 15:18:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by astfgl.hanazo.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id A093E3E7BA1A; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 17:18:10 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
From: otroan@employees.org
In-Reply-To: <m1kLSoi-0000HMC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 17:18:10 +0200
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <CB2A165E-1EFD-44C8-AB14-58911F614007@employees.org>
References: <8f964b8650cd4b619ff47aed5b07bc67@huawei.com> <7ef6cbcc-164f-383c-658b-b3c0df859535@go6.si> <1af87e24-1410-8f89-b50d-9c61694e4644@foobar.org> <f97b7ac2-0b36-2fae-58fd-eddee6f8b408@gmail.com> <76f10fa7030044c4a0b71443fde92f24@huawei.com> <CAHL_VyC7u7bNJD9pUzbFTrBtifbCVmQtPn4YHHs5g7T6omKwLQ@mail.gmail.com> <2e11a0315196499c81b72c171e014650@huawei.com> <EB3611C3-8849-4670-AFAD-4924AC79E26A@fugue.com> <93e01391b78b4c19be87f58f68281cbf@huawei.com> <CAHL_VyDhUO9mMTXEB1Z53-sA4KtHMu4-vdB0zb-oukanmEdARw@mail.gmail.com> <5b2f71a95a7944f0bcda368c11c6d7a2@huawei.com> <CAHL_VyDP-w9LzQTCkQM-tyjVo+T982aazFJTWeNPvGqHSHRtgQ@mail.gmail.com> <6f5fabd632fb4954adc13ea805be3c0b@huawei.com> <CAHL_VyDO_DTtE2Uj-T2f=a4wdJ2QtNrtO8YwMS88rZtcit5MrQ@mail.gmail.com> <b18832ca2efb44d59d2186863f56481b@huawei.com> <m1kKgil-0000LLC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <7080ee174bdc4ddbb800778f4707d442@huawei.com> <m1kKipE-0000IgC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <f43b44fceb114ceeafa75a48f360aaec@huawei.com> <m1kL3i9-0000IuC@stereo. hq.phicoh.net> <D3C32A83-5DCC-4BE9-93AE-C129ACB27449@employees.org> <m1kL4tV-0000KeC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <96911F6E-B380-46CB-B165-2AFDEB4D9A87@employees.org> <m1kL5Kk-0000FXC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <01CA8512-1866-4909-8490-B28377E66C00@employees.org> <m1kLQMD-0000IfC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <413ACF56-751E-4510-96C7-2B9491507C3B@fugue.com> <22BC0C68-65DC-47BC-8C05-F12EF9B8B26B@employees.org> <m1kLSoi-0000HMC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-9@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Oc6QaPbAiw6FjohlsfVnLMzvNGw>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Flash renumbering
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 15:18:18 -0000

>> What use of DHCP PD are you referring to here?
>> DHCP PD is only defined to work across administrative boundaries.
>> "Hierarchical DHCP PD"?
> 
> In practice, CPEs offer DHCPv6 PD to downstream routers even if there is no
> clear administrative boundary.

Right, and it's failure cases have been discussed before.

I see Ted is on an 8 year long loop. ;-)
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/oOZ8a1eEYkc0WoTuq917dzOn-fc/

Cheers,
Ole

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email