IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Flash renumbering

Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com> Mon, 21 September 2020 11:00 UTC

Return-Path: <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14FBB3A0C29 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 04:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mpemHHQ9ck2m for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 04:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 924D83A0C53 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 04:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml732-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 8494549F8BFE4853F97C; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 12:00:25 +0100 (IST)
Received: from msceml703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.219.141.161) by lhreml732-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.83) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 12:00:25 +0100
Received: from msceml703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.219.141.161) by msceml703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.219.141.161) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 14:00:24 +0300
Received: from msceml703-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.219.141.161]) by msceml703-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.219.141.161]) with mapi id 15.01.1913.007; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 14:00:24 +0300
From: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
CC: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Flash renumbering
Thread-Index: AdaLlIyewLCjExjqRk+nNQVH29wmCwAzUPGAABOUmgAAGqqFAAAbuXfAAAxRMoAAAqvQAAAH3I0AAADZjwAAEcY4AAB1oyuA
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:00:24 +0000
Message-ID: <87d3dc10e9ef403284f12082fb228d45@huawei.com>
References: <f0d9ce6b-f917-cd3c-cd0d-e460d175ee6c@gmail.com> <1A960746-3BF4-4238-B314-1CA9198D452D@employees.org> <df038f7d-f322-81e3-caee-024db0046d4c@gont.com.ar>
In-Reply-To: <df038f7d-f322-81e3-caee-024db0046d4c@gont.com.ar>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.197.29]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/PYRwrNkh4uZztm6QjLkRwpaKPKo>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Flash renumbering
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:00:32 -0000

If you account for
how many subscribers have 2 box solution in the apartment
how many have IPv6
how many insist to provision some box as bridge,
Then 30% would be converted to 0.27%

> -----Original Message-----
> From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fernando Gont
> Sent: 19 сентября 2020 г. 8:50
> To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>; Brian E Carpenter
> <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
> Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [v6ops] Flash renumbering
> 
> On 18/9/20 18:21, Ole Troan wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On 18 Sep 2020, at 22:57, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 19-Sep-20 05:11, Gyan Mishra wrote:
> >>>
> >>> All
> >>>
> >>> I really still feel this use case being Broadband provider PD
> >>> related stale prefix issue  is really a corner case for SOHO users
> >>
> >> Why is that a "corner case"? We can count SOHO networks by the hundreds
> of millions, compared with enterprise networks in millions. They both matter,
> but SOHOs are about two orders of magnitude greater in number.
> >
> > Corner case because Service Providers generally do not flash renumber their
> customers.
> 
> This was already discussed in v6ops. We have at least 30% of those.
> While we can debate on the meaning of "generally", I bet we'd all agree that a
> 30% of failure rate is unacceptable.
> 
> Thanks,
> --
> Fernando Gont
> e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint:
> 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email