Re: [v6ops] Flash renumbering

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 16 September 2020 21:07 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55BC3A112A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:07:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dd8k10wHYzR8 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x634.google.com (mail-pl1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::634]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4EB43A110E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x634.google.com with SMTP id j7so3862947plk.11 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nl4pJVUbaEYnI9mvi8nTOmG93RsHfiQYckzLf75hKf8=; b=o+igiIENX+y/fA5oXvSC4EQ+OVDlVowgLpUmIkZGrS/4g2mCcwds5nOY+dP97kGpU+ LnBJYJQt9rUQ//JgSMaCYw3j6nmXAIJKFiB4EESkBVImNpq6jDhMS0qVo+PmNWauLmsQ LyVY/4Ypx2wLzhCJgHX+bsgVJXvQaTE2cnb8CNhyzpe8hoJNxckx9Se/R8niMOiGp1y/ 251mvwgTKdI/DlajHvz/49PpIsMNavyz3S9dxaM8kSZPAx8Se4wAy1Jz9YYyKuxGQ61x JB9ta2wvNLhgZ6mdfN7QhU6IaV1wHsRL7KgIuDXsQbONbSVfMmbpZ5hnOXc/kg3nowW2 0lig==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nl4pJVUbaEYnI9mvi8nTOmG93RsHfiQYckzLf75hKf8=; b=kMTkXzbtCf1bNZaaHsu+UxhKLm2edKlXw1Ibm3UGSHKlLC9dhkwP1+byleMm7kIstj ae2p2pq24vPgSALJcLxXgr+juhZpY+3FTzR78DaxUvP4ULwVCMxb7pGPqhE0IZLuOsxf A+egeuleFsLLsWNEQ8cMIfPtAhkOw2UxGKMsXao7cU+bzFaaR17mLUq9RQFS7X6sku1b a3XFkvgn8RvycXCZoPrLGuFXTvXIDC4/iy4o8Pw516uJR6GJbvfqBBbVHaroLwLowR38 YzzDgl197+XbTA3ApmuNEC27yi7s7I4mS5BSUvvHVNDKbjy3QUi4PR3JqFDXlfd0pH5y uCig==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533bEfOMCEcfPP/Ip51XpkmbJb3tqU9+v7Zo4FipBQmV9Mzk7JQX JoQEY95tKCs67jXIYEZ8Fho7wpD34/Y=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzLT5Sm6K6ImnZGpYawQ0/bQAsxkcsGMw/pETsvWtiMyjQ/Omc6K6JsZoK+/XD8k1A2kip3Ww==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1283:: with SMTP id fw3mr5522766pjb.60.1600290427691; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:07:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([151.210.138.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gf12sm3450351pjb.16.2020.09.16.14.07.06 for <v6ops@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:07:07 -0700 (PDT)
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <8f964b8650cd4b619ff47aed5b07bc67@huawei.com> <7ee317a3-05b7-0c78-0abf-47075839223e@si6networks.com> <3c220cce7c834d50a09784923cb40910@huawei.com> <f93a1cc9-d310-4c88-4a33-a749785c72be@si6networks.com> <a03794fb2d514389b33222f0b3e194c2@huawei.com> <17401cd6-e337-4a51-e3b6-6e02978f9c1b@si6networks.com> <82df400c0e2840e1aef309211c5f1c92@huawei.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <349d3a52-398d-2a5f-b887-12f53bf2cf6f@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:07:04 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <82df400c0e2840e1aef309211c5f1c92@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/AWWaBiEKG3vb8FmLQRFSdhXC9So>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Flash renumbering
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 21:07:10 -0000

On 17-Sep-20 05:32, Vasilenko Eduard wrote:
>> All these things expose a stituation that is not robust. You are essentially arguing for brokenness.
> Partially agree. Better to fix.

25 years watching vendors of low price devices have convinced me that there will always be broken devices in millions of SOHO networks. Hosts absolutely must be as robust as possible. Ideally that means applying quite complex heuristics, not fixed default timers, but all the IETF can do is suggest the best compromise on timers for unmanaged networks.

The timers should all be configurable in a managed network.

  Brian