Re: [v6ops] Scope of Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-ipv6-ula-scope-00.txt)

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Sat, 13 February 2021 22:14 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F3923A1044 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 14:14:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L-vAD8n50EVy for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 14:14:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk1-x736.google.com (mail-qk1-x736.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::736]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23DD63A1041 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 14:14:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk1-x736.google.com with SMTP id c3so2546030qkj.11 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 14:14:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=m7yJIKzvuU4Bxl8tl3bWTT+TlJp/OGWA0PLGdSxLQDs=; b=1LIJy6Z4kWtQnCiUDaBriliKkXCu+8jrl2bgfrnrxloAg9f5VcOibMwp7vXQx8MH5T KZX/zaq7nJKGzz8GIrvFM+dSY3pI0YLMPK/tdRoYHi/mDzJx+0/tU8NMiyI4Xy29NoBF Zn5kU2ykq1if3ZW7h4/YCeHIWDlDuSIWK+xi6P6eaitThkbHUnvIt/bRwynQUmnOJclb MygF07+uq6LlbA3bNjFS2mruLYfhIjOABWLnMQR3MV6nzAYrh5iLNzS0EEbZgIL7mfw1 yzbfm/2u5J2u+tP5P3ie8EXMDpAMMzsv4ETsNF5Axdw2N6FT5GBsyTkXd8R0b6jzIiVH fiyQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=m7yJIKzvuU4Bxl8tl3bWTT+TlJp/OGWA0PLGdSxLQDs=; b=P6uDQX0UU9qcyMnBoRTHpRJF8Mv4uaNdYHQeqSh/o5aWBo5QaOARBGQjg+IndNqic1 AxLFhQCMONQ6WUIxGqCKgQqD7c+3mOks4D1uytdn4TCuWyfpQrAnhF68cP/NzWkMIgK0 4UmzxL5G0bFuKixJeCVFoRovwQ1VAvXTkacT4tEwEH+IsnWWysRjYcd3Y2AUZ92anP0h YqsMqTFwokV5/ksrlqq8mPYnBkW++6YNlZRW6RlUNENlSSp9m4jjEjN1jFisDQVdcUHm JOvNoh6rF2MsbtPj5bVLaj2W+wZ8HvTGehbgi8z/bF/C+OdoTnRsEbJc/zq6Q5VGok8s jBzQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532l55ArgBhO/fqj1u/hEKVMKSdwpKN9wVR41bIJHGXk3Ij1qnP2 GXyajtibcLX6/ufF0Y+Qf9hkC1mXehd7Ow==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxQ8R2gBPRCucoL4PU1as/AEJI7TQQconKzUciVGz6NCTM/8Z0ftQNmkDT3pzLIlpcZuzIzSw==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:e217:: with SMTP id g23mr8901660qki.283.1613254492028; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 14:14:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-24-91-177-160.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.91.177.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m186sm8894720qkd.111.2021.02.13.14.14.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 13 Feb 2021 14:14:51 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 17:14:50 -0500
Message-Id: <AAD553D4-15A0-4589-AC33-99E40538D033@fugue.com>
References: <988e3743-3632-d480-72c7-ab64583d4c38@si6networks.com>
Cc: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>, Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, 6man@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <988e3743-3632-d480-72c7-ab64583d4c38@si6networks.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18E156)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/DMnpPWhbrnfIB3_YskGJ78Zz0Xg>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Scope of Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-ipv6-ula-scope-00.txt)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 22:14:54 -0000

On Feb 13, 2021, at 17:08, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:
> If a new scope was created such that scope(LL) < scope(ULA) < scope(GUA),  this rule in Dest Address selection would prefer ULAs:
> 
> 
>   Rule 8: Prefer smaller scope.
>   If Scope(DA) < Scope(DB), then prefer DA.  Similarly, if Scope(DA) >
>   Scope(DB), then prefer DB.

No, rule 6 would already have chosen the GUA. 

>> It’s perhaps worth noticing that in the presence of Happy Eyeballs and gethostbyname(), I don’t know how many applications are actually using the destination address sorting rules.
> 
> All but browsers? Or am I missing something?

Any application that doesn’t have a library that does dest addr selection is going to just pick the first address it finds, or try them all, or something like that.