Re: [v6ops] SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 25 October 2019 19:47 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4463E12011C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Ik8wxguaPGT for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:47:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x543.google.com (mail-pg1-x543.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::543]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E648B12004F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x543.google.com with SMTP id f19so2177565pgn.13 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=d5pOH9HjSn/EJ/2HzIh9fMrdtUylYoNw4JdKl3tsu+A=; b=j4xbBwzi/Ff1RapB5pKR1/hkxYkUlZCP3CPK/sd9ZBpX3N9GnCxkHqO95vClo7UU44 2m0stTiAk4bASEAMf1SOGUlP1SO0qrW3VVVIUKWxXiuXG4ip8kSzgM37m0C+7F+b+SB9 X2kdD8CtKCgK3c4RHtceAgk4IFTA7VrGg0BOZqwiFK04GsbVv/ScoMBAC3y75tc5gV7R HJdp1YkiqCs2b6Ayoa+U7MsWVD3/0hHahH6JMhtTJxDuZoa27ZroWoc/nL9JIPD8Flu5 B+kj47am90er0i2PrGph8+5mZX0BpDOkGmHtLwI2m2KXOuEFhEgkwKTfrKSKXDZQES4V 0WIg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=d5pOH9HjSn/EJ/2HzIh9fMrdtUylYoNw4JdKl3tsu+A=; b=NQXj8oKsfakRNIfhceEuZRPWv5PFF35mX0DIImIsxFArcYhyPegZ5BcFUzpxi2+9Ap DMEmwuWh9quVpBDKEKe6e+S7aaB6BMi3rjkVQaVJczbUPYcq8uCgtVO+a/NwVG/ruV4Y apHEvFmb5fYe0QwKzugIAK7dWcUlaiZrKvi0wgoF1fkviKLUOIT3B6ncznpqHP/Kzgla meFuHkfMtzz3oCMUFMIPV97Dz5+FhuM9KYOjCp2ZODnghyIdFoLPR7pt9cjR9Fzg42fG 3ZZiR09Pyn5twcD+MYiAz5+/9E1Fh8P09mEw4r6AMIrO7cOExXK1UeSFLuItalVcg7fW SHvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVn6Ub6v0FzmnIg7BmSmGqJimO0SysBgY4lATMjIyb95is3pxZD lpCyVcxtZrIL/xkBXIFcZkSD13rd
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxgf6PaBjRMWXh3VPpGDWERQusLfwBRyqh4Ro5nl3TSfqvYu4OC3wbBTKiQwQwoQCe0eTu4Uw==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:1e06:: with SMTP id e6mr6137641pfe.181.1572032861179; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] (46.137.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.137.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n23sm3395222pff.137.2019.10.25.12.47.39 for <v6ops@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:47:40 -0700 (PDT)
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <m1iNIFE-0000IwC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <d1b6855d-bde9-7b53-4809-0846bb9772e4@si6networks.com> <CAO42Z2x7vudujw5t++obry56g=VNjQXXTHFK8pBPk0jmk78Bcg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJoHkZ8pTjszP0vw4BjX0HUhmPa6wJONzdy2JEm5iqAfBUvjRg@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2wCYi4KWTEz1hUSPVr9+hu8GaHRkPuvQQ2P00knvnPaaQ@mail.gmail.com> <848BA3B3-36B4-4C42-86D0-88759BC45D5A@employees.org> <A61279DA-4678-4A10-9117-6CA227AE2FA5@cisco.com> <A90AD47E-00E2-4EAB-8BD8-142CC10A6B6F@employees.org> <m1iNv5U-0000KUC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <E273241D-9C35-4E07-9525-DF7FA786F419@employees.org> <m1iNywd-0000KmC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <49A6064C-3AA0-4AA6-B78E-ED8404D35B97@employees.org> <40c89b34-03ae-4a9d-0b6d-610e3b8564b2@foobar.org>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <dd5eebeb-a852-b55c-31bf-14af2c2e03d2@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 08:47:39 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <40c89b34-03ae-4a9d-0b6d-610e3b8564b2@foobar.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/OZuwI6hjL8QG8oye1CsfZQFWok4>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 19:47:43 -0000

On 26-Oct-19 03:27, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Ole Troan wrote on 25/10/2019 13:53:
>> This is a response to the proposals of violating a fundamental
>> expectation of stable addressing in IPv6.
> is that a fundamental design principle of ipv6?  This is news.

Not that I'm aware of, but (as the 6renum WG showed) that doesn't
mean that planned renumbering is easy; and unplanned renumbering
is still a bug.

Mitigations needed.

   Brian