IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] A broken promise - "You said PD Prefix Valid Lifetime is going to be X"

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 01 November 2019 19:39 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4651209A5 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 12:39:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wnBMbaeFs-kk for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 12:39:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x836.google.com (mail-qt1-x836.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::836]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DCC8120843 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 12:39:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x836.google.com with SMTP id h2so1149163qto.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 12:39:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=XVZjtFNc6HM1YAX4VRFIL6ny5nBi9pMY/F09yaGOdug=; b=AsToR71/ggUafjoNv3gTr26tnk7Hmt0jMuJXYz4S0GL7HPGt0GUrAkDbtb6YrBWXqy F7SH4A3lJ9g2Zlx73lnNjW9G4+kWekeSmKoa7uOsknuGrPQOW/Me+/7N8ye4R9crsacS Q59i40/ADK1EXcTi1O0lXUfsw57tV3Lrn4ECwk4hiT7zlLz8d4pZ5sIp1HMnjsEi9fwX EYc3dfdZhL1t9xKiyNlmXye5b60v59oYsZVonI3P+I6Y08yCoVDlXedt88ba29haYiku dFfOvlHgl1AlFf61/SYyO3yWgNe9j00stg46SvgEBUvgGCE6gZQTbEVH93cDBgu5yt4O jSww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=XVZjtFNc6HM1YAX4VRFIL6ny5nBi9pMY/F09yaGOdug=; b=BMNDG+m0ZTNQQwqbitqNpcwdvzj5ow5y5HnDVB8b8aOohRWQPgdAzk/0zzc4IzsmLb XY112Q+Y8hDDI+PKBj2O6QjSKjeva7DLE3wTcJnkcn/8diqoTgqWg3lRYI4ReL82nDiB aCHrD/QWhWxmMx/SOyewxW5JVnqxIYPwQBWf9orRW3aM5KVp7PGppHJkacBvT0mdCp5V +KvYOzD+Af8r00jwyJFMfDKNcd3BM8kWDPB7cSCIcGv62Q0d322uLddwDRgSiHv6217P bAJGkwSO2x2KLwHpDToKpSEYaVaWmAcCFSQYFwxM2jR/g7T8uv5g2t3rbLFH6XC0hipX HSEg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWkk3uVBEJ2kUEqFhTnicFSZkrVkAYbR4u8tHTgFlU3ZngFQRQ9 Ue+I6NLR/Vp7VpAJS3WJwDvAuD5Lu9taOQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxxhWw0INv7SHDD9qqHg5Dwu1Ixw/XjLafsxOGAIi8U04+vh/XfHhOVEqM1PuIVvOL7HgWpdw==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:2432:: with SMTP id c47mr1136879qtc.74.1572637184205; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 12:39:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18b:300:36ee:cef:776b:2643:f7b7? ([2601:18b:300:36ee:cef:776b:2643:f7b7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h185sm4757851qkc.7.2019.11.01.12.39.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Nov 2019 12:39:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <E5957FFC-F616-46EB-9354-F50C14DF5C4A@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_765FFF18-2197-4ED7-9E23-8632BCD2D48E"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3601.0.10\))
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 15:39:42 -0400
In-Reply-To: <C9DB0F8E-D8D6-4FC7-B325-B2EB9DF1806B@delong.com>
Cc: sthaug@nethelp.no, v6ops@ietf.org
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
References: <94BBC308-365D-41A8-96FB-242BF63FFBF9@employees.org> <D3B1E770-F199-4605-BF78-A3637D6CDB42@fugue.com> <4288FBC0-C421-464F-9D55-7FB77AA1FA4E@employees.org> <20191101.124409.30333597.sthaug@nethelp.no> <BEC713D0-361F-4489-9D57-29781BC70B67@delong.com> <BA156D22-15D4-43F6-BE74-AB681F5B0BF6@fugue.com> <C9DB0F8E-D8D6-4FC7-B325-B2EB9DF1806B@delong.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3601.0.10)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/ZBDOiCG1U1RO1ptnQlqBQSgPq-k>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] A broken promise - "You said PD Prefix Valid Lifetime is going to be X"
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 19:39:48 -0000

On Nov 1, 2019, at 2:23 PM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
>> I don’t think that’s the issue.   I think the issue is that “no flash renumbering” is a nice-to-have, not a must, because the layers above layer two can adapt when layer two breaks.   We’ve done a lot of efforts to try to fix this problem at layer two, and none of them have succeeded.
> 
> Flash renumbering is NOT a layer 2 issue, it’s a layer 3 issue.
> 
>> This is not to say that making layer two as solid as possible shouldn’t be a goal; just that it is merely one of the tools we have for making the network reliable, not the /only/ tool.
> 
> Yeah, but we’re really talking more about layer 3 than layer 2 here.

Sorry, I was referring to layer 3.   I think I was still thinking about RA Guard for some reason, and that’s an L2 thing.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email