IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds

Timothy Winters <twinters@iol.unh.edu> Wed, 30 October 2019 12:29 UTC

Return-Path: <twinters@iol.unh.edu>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FFC9120145 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 05:29:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=iol.unh.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KzyeQR8SQKKe for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 05:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com (mail-wm1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::331]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DBC012013D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 05:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id q70so1916678wme.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 05:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OTTy7yQYPVsqZrGlpqhziL/O33EQ5OMGeUFOHv+KxRg=; b=MHsckmvrd6WoyaGnTV8eCZmXajUHJaM/Adg8BZ3HJ9pvjjyI7dp+IU6lAN5YACLf3G hvEpQDlgP2U6Lu8XivD9Vc3y9sWBsTafUmr3aa1IRh1qzaqXz8/BrBX/bdJ2ycGZNXJK okVutiGMtvlqBHbV6F4iukuHjEi8wVpZO3idk=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OTTy7yQYPVsqZrGlpqhziL/O33EQ5OMGeUFOHv+KxRg=; b=TBnN9ubxbAzBZy7Cd6iVnS1pLpu9FXUcTM0EmyE3CMBm8FKxiiKe9W1zUmMDw4P8CA IHaXLGGudrlNaQc5QHJIppPX1MXjNb9xUUNSOFtyUq1UVJkBdWTKjesuHhgkhi9SnW3d KT4Qy2QuEKzAl2B+FRD8YZyOd93RRGXrilAsnrq+u1VX+6qSzLIGoIZhb2HCtyblMICL oJOyTkoXHs/A2G/db4GjCYIr404WX4rBmHpedCQWyhGL1VU0h4No0DJJ0JaCC4dRbvYP vSPu08i5aLjRasOZXQmYSQkzOn21nMnNvudWGaJmpsIvhBsjqLZ5+EPsImGo1tHnJgaC Ui+w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUjnHvVlLcvnm7/PXfYlhDJhg1MIiJNVZTbaHUxzEamARF8sx5G 8Nfco0UDQvWaKzdPR92XzEjBRFcyqDX/oD/LqGD1rFW6PnvwOA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz0Yhplzx3eCf8um2xbW1gSzwKXBI9zwPMpZZvve7k+BNwmyxdZ/lHzh1kJPxrsoY8eFvckqyByjKrCXa7qkb4=
X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cd05:: with SMTP id f5mr3530406wmj.24.1572438595589; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 05:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <m1iPlMZ-0000J5C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <FACE45EC-27FC-437A-A5BF-D800DF089B50@fugue.com> <837E9523-14FC-4F6C-88FC-DCC316265299@employees.org> <90576322-be50-b8b1-31dd-bb1ef870993d@foobar.org>
In-Reply-To: <90576322-be50-b8b1-31dd-bb1ef870993d@foobar.org>
From: Timothy Winters <twinters@iol.unh.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 08:29:44 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOSSMjVhK_V4HpMzprOyo9pj=ysFef+uZUs=twd_zfPaBdPu3Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Cc: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ebedcf05961fe397"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/j7kjeRFXBqreMeJSc-Vm9I72hO4>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 12:29:59 -0000

Hi Ted,

Yes we have a couple of test cases for IPv6 Ready CE Router Logo that
confirms this behavior.  One focuses on "Prefix Change" or what your
calling Flash renumber.  I will note this is a common failure the first
time devices fail.

Regards,
Tim

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 7:26 AM Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:

> Ole Troan wrote on 30/10/2019 11:01:
> > What a CPE does do, is to send an ICMP destination unreachable (5 -
> > Source address failed ingress/egress policy) as the source address
> > would violate the unicast RPC check. RFC7084, L-14.
> what many, if not most, CPEs do is drop the flow on the ground and move
> on with life.
>
> Nick
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email