[v6ops] SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Wed, 23 October 2019 08:55 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02EB712093B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 01:55:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g8cRBOE0hfoE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 01:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C18711208FD for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 01:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.4.76] (unknown [190.179.111.238]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5EE2086A4A; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:55:42 +0200 (CEST)
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Message-ID: <85b1ef40-f107-0ece-3e71-377f4d22dd46@si6networks.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 03:51:32 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/t5gXYvUWwgV2gskH6QgesB4JVSw>
Subject: [v6ops] SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 08:55:50 -0000

Folks,

Earlier this year there was a lot of discussion about slaac renumbering
problems. Our original I-D covered everything from the problem statement
to proposed protocol updates and operational workarounds.

Based on the comments received while discussing this topic on this list
and other forums, and in order to keep the discussion better focused on
specific aspects of the problem, we have posted a v6ops-targetted
document that focuses on:

* The problem statement
* Discussion of operational workarounds, and associated constraints

The document is available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-v6ops-slaac-renum

We'd like to hear from the wg whether we have missed anything, whether
the document is useful to the community, etc.

Thanks!

Cheers,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492