IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed

Marc Petit-Huguenin <marc@petit-huguenin.org> Tue, 09 November 2021 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <marc@petit-huguenin.org>
X-Original-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253A53A0EC4 for <112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 10:00:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.229
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.229 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.33, SPF_HELO_FAIL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7Qf7GISiGsZN for <112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 10:00:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from implementers.org (implementers.org [92.243.22.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31F263A0E96 for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 10:00:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPV6:2601:204:e600:411:d250:99ff:fedf:93cd] (unknown [IPv6:2601:204:e600:411:d250:99ff:fedf:93cd]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (Client CN "Marc Petit-Huguenin", Issuer "implementers.org" (verified OK)) by implementers.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C11EBAE269; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 19:00:44 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <99769385-97be-a729-ab5f-5efb40bb7ecd@petit-huguenin.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 10:00:42 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
Cc: 112attendees@ietf.org
References: <d1fc4b13-89a7-3096-7b9a-6d62997a9b68@cea.fr> <594C5422-D172-480F-9C83-4C5EBB587CE0@gmail.com>
From: Marc Petit-Huguenin <marc@petit-huguenin.org>
In-Reply-To: <594C5422-D172-480F-9C83-4C5EBB587CE0@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------yE9aOhcGTlntv0vFwaGr2dCv"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/112attendees/0SjJ0UOZUSvye7OgI486NeIpWKc>
Subject: Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed
X-BeenThere: 112attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 112 attendees <112attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/112attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:112attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 18:00:54 -0000

YMMV, I loaded the "Important Dates"[1] in my calendar.  This in turn gives me the date when I can add the meeting agenda[3] to my calendar.  Adding the upcoming interim meeting calendar[4] should cover most activities at the IETF.

[1] webcal://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/important-dates.ics [2]
[2] Adding the time for the end of the cut-off would be helpful.
[3] webcal://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/112/agenda.ics
[4] webcal://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/upcoming.ics

On 11/9/21 09:49, Bob Hinden wrote:
> Alex,
> 
> This was announced on September 2 "Proposed Experiment for IETF 112: Moving the Plenary”.
> 
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/z3FZnHmcuxDevC4BkmoY8I89yPk/
> 
> I didn’t attend.
> 
> Bob
> 
> 
>> On Nov 9, 2021, at 9:43 AM, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr> wrote:
>>
>> I missed the Plenary last week, because I didnt expect it there.
>>
>> This time IETF meeting is so strange.  It spans two weeks time with importnat things in the first week, including the Plenary, but the WG meetings are in the second week.
>>
>> All these discussions we had in shmoo WG about online or not online and I did not see any sign about Plenary being in the first week.
>>
>> All these discussions about which 3-4 time slots are best around the world, which UTC ways to refer to them, etc, and I missed the Plenary.
>>
>> Sigh...
>>
>> Alex
>>
>>



-- 
Marc Petit-Huguenin
Email: marc@petit-huguenin.org
Blog: https://marc.petit-huguenin.org
Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email