IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed

Petr Špaček <pspacek@isc.org> Wed, 10 November 2021 12:45 UTC

Return-Path: <pspacek@isc.org>
X-Original-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900213A0ED6 for <112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 04:45:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.429
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.429 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.33, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isc.org header.b=fA7ma+ph; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isc.org header.b=OfNFdLb6
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3IyQ1sVwljyx for <112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 04:45:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AC103A0FF7 for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 04:45:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zimbrang.isc.org (zimbrang.isc.org [149.20.1.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F43A433F28 for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 12:45:29 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=isc.org; s=ostpay; t=1636548329; bh=ddV5XjI+kFCXr2/YtxqbqLo8xEZbd+e+IADBCLFHXUo=; h=Date:To:References:From:Subject:In-Reply-To; b=fA7ma+phS85ty32A3Ec0fLVnltj9BNwyAI9sBu1LUNSyVPALqTQEGnUEUxTMwy8+s 0piC5+yeftc96NCuPIkqGXnSROEE+YtZHcOF5Ql7NSBHucskKyhFWzWXAWBYNj3CXQ hdkZ7h4oSV44B+oPkUYnLriNnIHiB1bFEfHRgaLM=
Received: from zimbrang.isc.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zimbrang.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7841BF08E3C for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 12:45:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zimbrang.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D1F8F08E3F for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 12:45:29 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zimbrang.isc.org 4D1F8F08E3F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isc.org; s=05DFB016-56A2-11EB-AEC0-15368D323330; t=1636548329; bh=ddV5XjI+kFCXr2/YtxqbqLo8xEZbd+e+IADBCLFHXUo=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:To:From; b=OfNFdLb6f39MaKZGLV1/JX8rsx0CX3kyNfte7MuS0YxhEo6R6M582xLYLEVpRS7DR Z4xqJ824qpVAv6/fUW4SQWlCTbRorm4ob+51G3v7unv87NvyFaZZUD5Ger3ZbMnJWJ zvrfq2zr7JW/TAhJaVfsdQ+hLS/dgOxOHOjaDyDQ=
Received: from zimbrang.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbrang.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id YjLjkc8K9TWG for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 12:45:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.157] (ip-86-49-254-49.net.upcbroadband.cz [86.49.254.49]) by zimbrang.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4704F08E3C for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 12:45:28 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <c7f8aab3-2366-7f56-f7dd-258943f9b2b5@isc.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 13:45:26 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: 112attendees@ietf.org
References: <d1fc4b13-89a7-3096-7b9a-6d62997a9b68@cea.fr> <9360c78d-04a2-bb8e-5431-92f8dcd12274@labs.htt-consult.com> <0d62c15a-cc34-161e-53d3-c30314094bed@cea.fr> <5DC79F14-6C21-44B8-9C24-1F62A3AC4685@ericsson.com> <14eb9214-3e2c-b4c4-c9a0-83388c50570f@cea.fr>
From: Petr Špaček <pspacek@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <14eb9214-3e2c-b4c4-c9a0-83388c50570f@cea.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/112attendees/NlZdxvMxY3txAw2s_JuChz4_Sc4>
Subject: Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed
X-BeenThere: 112attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 112 attendees <112attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/112attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:112attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 12:45:41 -0000

On 10. 11. 21 11:49, Alexandre PETRESCU wrote:
> A Plenary is where all go, not just 30%.  In my humble oppinion.

Be careful with "all", please. E.g. I'm a IETF attendee since ~ IETF 99 
and I can count number of plenaries I attended on fingers of one hand.

Please not speculate without hard data (which are coming, if I 
understand Mirja's follow-up e-mail in this thread).


As a second data point (obviously anecdotal):
I'm heads-down in DNS stuff and don't follow internal IETF policies or 
shmoo discussions, and still I had no problem finding out about Plenary 
being a week earlier. In fact I remember seeing the information at least 
three times - despite me ignoring plenary on purpose:

- it's in plain sight on the IETF agenda page
- announced on announce list
- also exported as iCalendar and thus displayed in my calendar

To conclude this anecdote, the Plenary timing was not perceived as a 
surprise by a random person who's IETF involvement is very light. (Again 
as counterpoint of "all" and synonyms.)

-- 
Petr Špaček

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email