IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Tue, 09 November 2021 19:35 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E493A102B for <112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 11:35:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.869
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.869 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UeayybKsqkuP for <112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 11:35:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54E563A0E2F for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 11:35:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7369E548003; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 20:35:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: by faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 60E574E9D3C; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 20:35:30 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 20:35:30 +0100
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu>
Cc: Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>, Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>, "112attendees@ietf.org" <112attendees@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <YYrNgkzMsoYk+/cp@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <d1fc4b13-89a7-3096-7b9a-6d62997a9b68@cea.fr> <29389D4E-053E-4008-B236-F130A57C14A3@ericsson.com> <f22eaf35-fbe6-8214-b9e7-5b41ee9414fa@sit.fraunhofer.de> <4763C47D-A393-40BA-B416-CF994352C695@cs.ucla.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4763C47D-A393-40BA-B416-CF994352C695@cs.ucla.edu>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/112attendees/5iYb4fuvIkOxHT4O_4V8mxA1Z3w>
Subject: Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed
X-BeenThere: 112attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 112 attendees <112attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/112attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:112attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 19:35:45 -0000

Just for the fun of the counterargument:

The plenary seems to be the one session with the lowest probability that you want
to go to the microphone. Hence it is most easily the one to watch to instead of
sitting in (stats just because of the large number of participants). So the live
conflict issue is statistically probably less an issue.

Of course, if we're going to have long fun microphone lines as in the past,
this wouldn't be true anymore... ;-)

Toerless

On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 11:30:40AM -0800, Lixia Zhang wrote:
> 
> > On Nov 9, 2021, at 11:16 AM, Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Mirja,
> > 
> > I was aware of the scheduled plenary, but as I can dedicate only one week of full (schedule) attention to an IETF meeting, there was a good chance that I was blocked - and to no big surprise there was a blocker.
> > 
> > My assumption is that some people simply can only carve one week out of their calendar (not including chair's duty that on my part already suffer immensely due to time constraints in our current purely online epoch).
> > 
> > So, in essence... no. This does not seem to work (or best case scenario only based on pure chance).
> 
> + 1
> 
> Lixia

> -- 
> 112attendees mailing list
> 112attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/112attendees


-- 
---
tte@cs.fau.de

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email