Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week


> On Nov 9, 2021, at 11:35 AM, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> 
> Just for the fun of the counterargument:
> 
> The plenary seems to be the one session with the lowest probability that you want to go to the microphone.

not sure everyone would agree with this blank statement

> Hence it is most easily the one to watch to instead of
> sitting in (stats just because of the large number of participants). So the live
> conflict issue is statistically probably less an issue.
> 
> Of course, if we're going to have long fun microphone lines as in the past,
> this wouldn't be true anymore... ;-)
> 
> Toerless
> 
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 11:30:40AM -0800, Lixia Zhang wrote:
>> 
>>> On Nov 9, 2021, at 11:16 AM, Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Mirja,
>>> 
>>> I was aware of the scheduled plenary, but as I can dedicate only one week of full (schedule) attention to an IETF meeting, there was a good chance that I was blocked - and to no big surprise there was a blocker.
>>> 
>>> My assumption is that some people simply can only carve one week out of their calendar (not including chair's duty that on my part already suffer immensely due to time constraints in our current purely online epoch).
>>> 
>>> So, in essence... no. This does not seem to work (or best case scenario only based on pure chance).
>> 
>> + 1
>> 
>> Lixia
> 
>> -- 
>> 112attendees mailing list
>> 112attendees@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/112attendees
> 
> 
> -- 
> ---
> tte@cs.fau.de
> 
> -- 
> 112attendees mailing list
> 112attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/112attendees

Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed