IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed

Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu> Tue, 09 November 2021 19:30 UTC

Return-Path: <lixia@cs.ucla.edu>
X-Original-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B693A1033 for <112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 11:30:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B62uUBMjBpNk for <112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 11:30:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [131.179.128.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2D563A102B for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 11:30:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3E41600D1; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 11:30:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id 9R4Mf3F_MVNZ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 11:30:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9AE9160108; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 11:30:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu
Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id SQwD5ZmgbC0Y; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 11:30:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (wifi-131-179-51-187.host.ucla.edu [131.179.51.187]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C3DC11600D1; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 11:30:40 -0800 (PST)
From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu>
Message-Id: <4763C47D-A393-40BA-B416-CF994352C695@cs.ucla.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_52C3D58A-705F-471E-857B-858CAD1A966D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 11:30:40 -0800
In-Reply-To: <f22eaf35-fbe6-8214-b9e7-5b41ee9414fa@sit.fraunhofer.de>
Cc: Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>, "112attendees@ietf.org" <112attendees@ietf.org>
To: Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>
References: <d1fc4b13-89a7-3096-7b9a-6d62997a9b68@cea.fr> <29389D4E-053E-4008-B236-F130A57C14A3@ericsson.com> <f22eaf35-fbe6-8214-b9e7-5b41ee9414fa@sit.fraunhofer.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/112attendees/WZUXz4hdfGculWOqKybrWRZM0OI>
Subject: Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed
X-BeenThere: 112attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 112 attendees <112attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/112attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:112attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 19:30:49 -0000

> On Nov 9, 2021, at 11:16 AM, Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> 
> Hi Mirja,
> 
> I was aware of the scheduled plenary, but as I can dedicate only one week of full (schedule) attention to an IETF meeting, there was a good chance that I was blocked - and to no big surprise there was a blocker.
> 
> My assumption is that some people simply can only carve one week out of their calendar (not including chair's duty that on my part already suffer immensely due to time constraints in our current purely online epoch).
> 
> So, in essence... no. This does not seem to work (or best case scenario only based on pure chance).

+ 1

Lixia

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email