Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 09 November 2021 19:34 UTC
Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759303A0E2F for <112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 11:34:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UaiOwsbL0fhz for <112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 11:34:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oo1-xc2c.google.com (mail-oo1-xc2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 996C23A079D for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 11:34:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oo1-xc2c.google.com with SMTP id b31-20020a4a98e2000000b002bce352296cso30489ooj.1 for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 11:34:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6XN8z+0NmZ9js+m3urNmPO9Rufd8hRTiIMoOWL3q9UA=; b=i5Cat1WSeZ4ItbPYAaUHYCnLIF0TOK3QvJapjBCb5INAfjFeTh4aU2oeuDdfi0inqT J8jLl4y1bMiXdrG64yA9GHohkl8c+ThWTXj7VzAvVMAWLmI7pCCGhzG7yH4ZWWqm4sxR Tu+0lsZxwzLFJjFx4vv1CJLxKVwxqxK8RpDF8Z0V7bXksqUZj7dxSgpcSSTfSxuCfm8f arBVZE0Ewni9fJw5ZQxRdHHE7n/vU2dj9GjKJBX5D84DW5ewyL8izYjCELDkRLGNYwZU Fkwv8+tKYZ/sqhsIqtOzHYzwZU4Zx31hwRe9Pe4ENp5xxunddzcEcj5dZW44oAQdS4VI VXMw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6XN8z+0NmZ9js+m3urNmPO9Rufd8hRTiIMoOWL3q9UA=; b=j8Jjo2wZQu+iLOPyoQXm3Ri4y7QoIot7hzX+6xVjYPAdh0Untc9ZD4YZtXg3DZMNa9 OB6IhZoG1fPTmdKiFP/PH6zlqEQS862OInlit+Mf3efJt1tc8HKh0hroPJfsbVMRy34o ox54NzXHWmKcgN/hnMrdsSDnowPeE0oITWlxV6EGZrSXSUIUS7n6CoGXUDOX3R24Zu1v iU+BQiADVw6EuQjwaLMiyeQCPu2WGjJucBscQ2uE1ybDJqkzBUrxbL/3o0XtX2VflwY3 HRBlcnWgwRtqUtQkq+P6MW1SRglD4C/7xRiIBGvazMKEH5Xq+IBRbOl80cB/i+CHdXEs Z9SQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531OIMd8xrum5hG7QWUBCZdyQF3gvqzIgLIR8wTYc67K3qYvQ1uC kdwz2drFhUFTw5jViBez6rpVywNjv54kcqjzAEwXlA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzekkAxbyXsx4mOAmkuCMZ9E5DkGC5QN9YU5Bf6ARZJ9zG5uQk+CDP3Tq7nxJ+479hAj9bhNbO6ANykD+GNSdo=
X-Received: by 2002:a4a:d284:: with SMTP id h4mr4957896oos.31.1636486448293; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 11:34:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <d1fc4b13-89a7-3096-7b9a-6d62997a9b68@cea.fr> <29389D4E-053E-4008-B236-F130A57C14A3@ericsson.com> <f22eaf35-fbe6-8214-b9e7-5b41ee9414fa@sit.fraunhofer.de>
In-Reply-To: <f22eaf35-fbe6-8214-b9e7-5b41ee9414fa@sit.fraunhofer.de>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 14:33:57 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1kq60bXNyCpDvy3Jds7hM1NCBCDdPRPZk-CgYu6GaffHA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>
Cc: "112attendees@ietf.org" <112attendees@ietf.org>, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>, Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006e390105d060314f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/112attendees/zBkCHBIEu-RX6C8Wi8j_fpEwgnc>
Subject: Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed
X-BeenThere: 112attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 112 attendees <112attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/112attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:112attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 19:34:16 -0000
FWIW the plenary worked well for me. I can’t easily carve out even one week for IETF, but I can schedule around it, and did. It helped that it was in European time, so didn’t clash much with my work meetings, but it’s always going to be a crap shoot. I’m very glad that it opened up more time for meetings. I was not surprised by the schedule—it was announced many times. On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 14:17 Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > Hi Mirja, > > I was aware of the scheduled plenary, but as I can dedicate only one > week of full (schedule) attention to an IETF meeting, there was a good > chance that I was blocked - and to no big surprise there was a blocker. > > My assumption is that some people simply can only carve one week out of > their calendar (not including chair's duty that on my part already > suffer immensely due to time constraints in our current purely online > epoch). > > So, in essence... no. This does not seem to work (or best case scenario > only based on pure chance). > > Viele Grüße, > > Henk > > On 09.11.21 19:09, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > > > sorry that you missed it. We are working on improved way to reach the > > community. I think that is an important issue. > > > > At least there is the recording: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59Ml55Tl9lY > > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59Ml55Tl9lY> > > > > Mirja > > > > *From: *112attendees <112attendees-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of > > Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr> > > *Organisation: *CEA > > *Date: *Tuesday, 9. November 2021 at 18:43 > > *To: *"112attendees@ietf.org" <112attendees@ietf.org> > > *Subject: *[112attendees] Plenary last week - missed > > > > I missed the Plenary last week, because I didnt expect it there. > > > > This time IETF meeting is so strange. It spans two weeks time with > > importnat things in the first week, including the Plenary, but the WG > > meetings are in the second week. > > > > All these discussions we had in shmoo WG about online or not online and > > I did not see any sign about Plenary being in the first week. > > > > All these discussions about which 3-4 time slots are best around the > > world, which UTC ways to refer to them, etc, and I missed the Plenary. > > > > Sigh... > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > -- > 112attendees mailing list > 112attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/112attendees >
- [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Bob Hinden
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Jared Mauch
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Borchert, Oliver (Fed)
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Henk Birkholz
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Lixia Zhang
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Lixia Zhang
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Ted Lemon
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Borchert, Oliver (Fed)
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed John C Klensin
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Petr Špaček
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Petr Špaček
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Andrew Campling
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Jared Mauch
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - Livingood, Jason
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - Joel Halpern Direct
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed Abdussalam Baryun