Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gather.town (was: Re: HotRFC Gather followup)

Second life would be great except that they don't have sandboxed clients,
which makes them not desirable to run for security reasons.

On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 9:05 AM Alexandre PETRESCU <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
wrote:

>
> Le 09/11/2021 à 14:40, Toerless Eckert a écrit :
> > On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 04:31:10AM -0800, Fred Baker wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Nov 8, 2021, at 8:05 PM, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I think it's a difference of opinion.
> >>> Ok. So, what are your top issues with gather.town ?
> >>>
> >>> (note: "must run on IPv6" is already sold ;-)
> >> Well, yes, it appears to have that issue. Mostly, I would say that it
> has a number of the needed attributes, but I find it borderline usable. It
> would be more usable if I thought in terms of tree structures populated
> with people. Personally, I don't.
> > Not sure what the Tree structure is, but it could explain why i like it
> ;-)
> >
> > How would you like to see it changed to increase its usefulness to you ?
> >
> > And if that is not the right question then maybe:
> >
> > How would a tool have to look like that would enable the best informal
> > discussions between IETF online participants (including orgs like
> secretariat,
> > eitor, hackathons, hotRFC, nomcom, etc-and-pp) ?
>
>
> Do you know secondlife? That kind of three dimensional experience in
> gather.town would be great for some.
>
> I was able to spend hours in secondlife, and then other hours in other
> recent conferences where such experiences were provided.
>
> Some talk about 'meta-verses', meta Universes.
>
> But of course, that could also be too much.  Not too much to ask, but
> too much immersing away from reality.
>
> Alex
>
> >
> > Cheers
> >      Toerless
> >
> --
> 112attendees mailing list
> 112attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/112attendees
>