Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gather.town (was: Re: HotRFC Gather followup)
Alexandre PETRESCU <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr> Tue, 09 November 2021 11:29 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
X-Original-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D1883A0EEC for <112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 03:29:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.33, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jszdQ45FVruz for <112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 03:29:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCBB93A0EEA for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 03:29:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 1A9BT8Tu021510 for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 12:29:08 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id D5066205432 for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 12:29:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA5A1205409 for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 12:29:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 1A9BT8lR014766 for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 12:29:08 +0100
Message-ID: <051e9a64-cabc-5433-ff58-b2c032323e54@cea.fr>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 12:29:07 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0
Content-Language: fr
To: 112attendees@ietf.org
References: <6016C557-1A75-479B-AA83-4792062553C9@gmail.com> <d879cfe9-7749-8d5f-f3cb-15a8e7e1515b@cea.fr> <CAGgd1Oc1ExPD69QBtXcoxiCc-cvkcghuq3wk3+=-YQuLh1mRqw@mail.gmail.com> <7da133bc-b3d0-25a8-1add-088e1ce2565b@petit-huguenin.org> <YYhI6hZL6uS3FB5H@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAKKJt-cnJa=LMh334N23k9oTDeG81Pv34LSZQWNwJpRtM2N5Rw@mail.gmail.com> <YYlRojIoGZm3wP0B@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <A1406214-64D1-41AF-B555-96949263939F@gmail.com> <YYnzbCWL5ravYT9T@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
From: Alexandre PETRESCU <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
Organization: CEA
In-Reply-To: <YYnzbCWL5ravYT9T@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms070503000006030402040508"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/112attendees/d6SS8sRa8aovQCAA06rYHlFkuv4>
Subject: Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gather.town (was: Re: HotRFC Gather followup)
X-BeenThere: 112attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 112 attendees <112attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/112attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:112attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 11:29:18 -0000
Le 09/11/2021 à 05:05, Toerless Eckert a écrit : > On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 03:55:08PM -0800, Fred Baker wrote: >> >>> On Nov 8, 2021, at 8:34 AM, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote: >>> >>> But right now, i think the mayority of participants are too lazy to >>> give gather.town enough playtime that they would start to see benefits *sigh* >> You describe yourself as a "fanboy". I have looked into it, and I'm not. >> I think you'll find that it's not about people being forced to use a tool they don't like and as a result liking it, > Thats sounds more like stockholm syndrom than what i said. > >> I think it's a difference of opinion. > Ok. So, what are your top issues with gather.town ? > > (note: "must run on IPv6" is already sold ;-) Sold ok, but has one tried gather.town on IPv6 exclusively and was happy with the experience? Last time I tried some features did not work (somme buttons on the left). I reported the issue multiple times. No answer. Alex > > Cheers > Toerless >
- [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Aaron Falk
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Alexander Clemm
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Deb Cooley
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Lixia Zhang
- [112attendees] To Slack or not... Re: HotRFC Gath… Toerless Eckert
- [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gather.… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Alexa Morris
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Randy Bush
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Randy Bush
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Fred Baker
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Fred Baker
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… John C Klensin
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Randy Bush
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Christian Huitema
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Mark Andrews
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Randy Bush
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Theresa Enghardt
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Michael Richardson