IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gather.town (was: Re: HotRFC Gather followup)

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Mon, 08 November 2021 21:07 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A723A040A; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 13:07:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mt8aCCamnVh8; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 13:07:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AC1E3A0C7A; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 13:06:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1mkBqq-0003Hp-UB; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 21:06:49 +0000
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 13:06:48 -0800
Message-ID: <m2y25yz79z.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>, 112attendees@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-f4oZh-+ipw5e4hxZHfqWu1Mr6asFm7j_RJRECkgMr_0Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6016C557-1A75-479B-AA83-4792062553C9@gmail.com> <d879cfe9-7749-8d5f-f3cb-15a8e7e1515b@cea.fr> <CAGgd1Oc1ExPD69QBtXcoxiCc-cvkcghuq3wk3+=-YQuLh1mRqw@mail.gmail.com> <7da133bc-b3d0-25a8-1add-088e1ce2565b@petit-huguenin.org> <YYhI6hZL6uS3FB5H@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAKKJt-cnJa=LMh334N23k9oTDeG81Pv34LSZQWNwJpRtM2N5Rw@mail.gmail.com> <YYlRojIoGZm3wP0B@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAKKJt-f4oZh-+ipw5e4hxZHfqWu1Mr6asFm7j_RJRECkgMr_0Q@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/112attendees/qeIWFtEKPB1IC90G9cEkOshFA2E>
Subject: Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gather.town (was: Re: HotRFC Gather followup)
X-BeenThere: 112attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 112 attendees <112attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/112attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:112attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 21:07:10 -0000

>> But right now, i think the mayority of participants are too lazy to
>> give gather.town enough playtime that they would start to see
>> benefits *sigh*
> 
> Gather gets better at almost every IETF meeting (modulo Randy's
> observation about spyware, etc.), so it's getting easier to find
> someone or something that you need to run into, but definitely having
> things in Gather that give people a reason to pop in would help with
> that.

imiho, putting any ietf act worthy of the note well MUST NOT be behind
a spy-wall.  that we are allowing this is really unbelievable.

there are things i wanted to attend which i simply can not.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email