Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gather.town (was: Re: HotRFC Gather followup)
Alexandre PETRESCU <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr> Tue, 09 November 2021 14:05 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
X-Original-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CC413A0D20 for <112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 06:05:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.33, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id phxKw3EruEgD for <112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 06:05:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C7143A0D1B for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 06:05:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 1A9E5cxO020459 for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 15:05:38 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A9C520564B for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 15:05:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE8E205648 for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 15:05:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 1A9E5cJH023831 for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 15:05:38 +0100
Message-ID: <abff74c3-824e-7131-6bff-b48549f3d8b5@cea.fr>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 15:05:37 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0
Content-Language: fr
To: 112attendees@ietf.org
References: <6016C557-1A75-479B-AA83-4792062553C9@gmail.com> <d879cfe9-7749-8d5f-f3cb-15a8e7e1515b@cea.fr> <CAGgd1Oc1ExPD69QBtXcoxiCc-cvkcghuq3wk3+=-YQuLh1mRqw@mail.gmail.com> <7da133bc-b3d0-25a8-1add-088e1ce2565b@petit-huguenin.org> <YYhI6hZL6uS3FB5H@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAKKJt-cnJa=LMh334N23k9oTDeG81Pv34LSZQWNwJpRtM2N5Rw@mail.gmail.com> <YYlRojIoGZm3wP0B@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <A1406214-64D1-41AF-B555-96949263939F@gmail.com> <YYnzbCWL5ravYT9T@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <3EB68C1B-34EF-4682-9B26-BB2828505A33@gmail.com> <YYp6XG9i9ikvHYaV@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
From: Alexandre PETRESCU <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
Organization: CEA
In-Reply-To: <YYp6XG9i9ikvHYaV@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms070607090707090505020201"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/112attendees/ixK677eznNPlkn8ctxdm4KXTT1c>
Subject: Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gather.town (was: Re: HotRFC Gather followup)
X-BeenThere: 112attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 112 attendees <112attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/112attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:112attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 14:05:45 -0000
Le 09/11/2021 à 14:40, Toerless Eckert a écrit : > On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 04:31:10AM -0800, Fred Baker wrote: >> >>> On Nov 8, 2021, at 8:05 PM, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote: >>> >>>> I think it's a difference of opinion. >>> Ok. So, what are your top issues with gather.town ? >>> >>> (note: "must run on IPv6" is already sold ;-) >> Well, yes, it appears to have that issue. Mostly, I would say that it has a number of the needed attributes, but I find it borderline usable. It would be more usable if I thought in terms of tree structures populated with people. Personally, I don't. > Not sure what the Tree structure is, but it could explain why i like it ;-) > > How would you like to see it changed to increase its usefulness to you ? > > And if that is not the right question then maybe: > > How would a tool have to look like that would enable the best informal > discussions between IETF online participants (including orgs like secretariat, > eitor, hackathons, hotRFC, nomcom, etc-and-pp) ? Do you know secondlife? That kind of three dimensional experience in gather.town would be great for some. I was able to spend hours in secondlife, and then other hours in other recent conferences where such experiences were provided. Some talk about 'meta-verses', meta Universes. But of course, that could also be too much. Not too much to ask, but too much immersing away from reality. Alex > > Cheers > Toerless >
- [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Aaron Falk
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Alexander Clemm
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Deb Cooley
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Lixia Zhang
- [112attendees] To Slack or not... Re: HotRFC Gath… Toerless Eckert
- [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gather.… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Alexa Morris
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Randy Bush
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Randy Bush
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Fred Baker
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Fred Baker
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… John C Klensin
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Randy Bush
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Christian Huitema
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Mark Andrews
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Randy Bush
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Theresa Enghardt
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Michael Richardson