IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gather.town (was: Re: HotRFC Gather followup)

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Tue, 09 November 2021 13:40 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 585A93A0CC3; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 05:40:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.869
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.869 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J8rcX6kGdEXF; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 05:40:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EA143A0CBC; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 05:40:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAAA254804B; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 14:40:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: by faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id D912F4E9D36; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 14:40:44 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 14:40:44 +0100
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>, Marc Petit-Huguenin <marc@petit-huguenin.org>, 112attendees@ietf.org, Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <YYp6XG9i9ikvHYaV@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <6016C557-1A75-479B-AA83-4792062553C9@gmail.com> <d879cfe9-7749-8d5f-f3cb-15a8e7e1515b@cea.fr> <CAGgd1Oc1ExPD69QBtXcoxiCc-cvkcghuq3wk3+=-YQuLh1mRqw@mail.gmail.com> <7da133bc-b3d0-25a8-1add-088e1ce2565b@petit-huguenin.org> <YYhI6hZL6uS3FB5H@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAKKJt-cnJa=LMh334N23k9oTDeG81Pv34LSZQWNwJpRtM2N5Rw@mail.gmail.com> <YYlRojIoGZm3wP0B@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <A1406214-64D1-41AF-B555-96949263939F@gmail.com> <YYnzbCWL5ravYT9T@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <3EB68C1B-34EF-4682-9B26-BB2828505A33@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3EB68C1B-34EF-4682-9B26-BB2828505A33@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/112attendees/v4mtb6odbO6fJs_mVeh2wM2h09Q>
Subject: Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gather.town (was: Re: HotRFC Gather followup)
X-BeenThere: 112attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 112 attendees <112attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/112attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:112attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 13:40:56 -0000

On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 04:31:10AM -0800, Fred Baker wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Nov 8, 2021, at 8:05 PM, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> > 
> >> I think it's a difference of opinion.
> > 
> > Ok. So, what are your top issues with gather.town ? 
> > 
> > (note: "must run on IPv6" is already sold ;-)
> 
> Well, yes, it appears to have that issue. Mostly, I would say that it has a number of the needed attributes, but I find it borderline usable. It would be more usable if I thought in terms of tree structures populated with people. Personally, I don't.

Not sure what the Tree structure is, but it could explain why i like it ;-)

How would you like to see it changed to increase its usefulness to you ?

And if that is not the right question then maybe:

How would a tool have to look like that would enable the best informal
discussions between IETF online participants (including orgs like secretariat,
eitor, hackathons, hotRFC, nomcom, etc-and-pp) ?

Cheers
    Toerless

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email