IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup

Alexandre PETRESCU <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr> Thu, 04 November 2021 12:37 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
X-Original-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C08B13A10F3 for <112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 05:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.229
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.229 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.33, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UAjUCFp62eqz for <112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 05:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38A8D3A10F1 for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 05:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 1A4CbDmI048969 for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 13:37:13 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 2BDC020591C for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 13:37:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7D6205851 for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 13:37:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 1A4CbDd4002544 for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 13:37:13 +0100
Message-ID: <d879cfe9-7749-8d5f-f3cb-15a8e7e1515b@cea.fr>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 13:37:12 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0
Content-Language: fr
To: 112attendees@ietf.org
References: <6016C557-1A75-479B-AA83-4792062553C9@gmail.com>
From: Alexandre PETRESCU <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
Organization: CEA
In-Reply-To: <6016C557-1A75-479B-AA83-4792062553C9@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms080203000905080609050207"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/112attendees/cS1_EPn_58SywOmunGQCZEnUxUc>
Subject: Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup
X-BeenThere: 112attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 112 attendees <112attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/112attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:112attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 12:37:22 -0000

For the 'what should change' part - I suggest to make it work ok fully 
on IPv6. Last time I checked it worked only partially on IPv6: the sound 
quality was worse on IPv6, some buttons on left could not be clicked on 
IPv6, etc.

Yours,

--
Alexandre Petrescu
alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr, tél 0169089223

Le 03/11/2021 à 17:33, Aaron Falk a écrit :
>
> An update & 2 questions:
>
> *Update:* The secretariat confirms that the HotRFC “rooms” will remain 
> up and available for your use through the end of the IETF next week.
>
> *Questions:*
>
>  1. Should we use Gather to do this again?
>  2. If so, what should we change?
>
> --aaron
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email