Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup
Marc Petit-Huguenin <marc@petit-huguenin.org> Sat, 06 November 2021 12:48 UTC
Return-Path: <marc@petit-huguenin.org>
X-Original-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E283A0CD4 for <112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Nov 2021 05:48:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.229
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.229 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.33, SPF_HELO_FAIL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kF2KXWs15P2C for <112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Nov 2021 05:48:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from implementers.org (implementers.org [92.243.22.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3509A3A0CBE for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Nov 2021 05:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPV6:2601:204:e600:411:d250:99ff:fedf:93cd] (unknown [IPv6:2601:204:e600:411:d250:99ff:fedf:93cd]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "Marc Petit-Huguenin", Issuer "implementers.org" (verified OK)) by implementers.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A68CAAE269; Sat, 6 Nov 2021 13:48:22 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <7da133bc-b3d0-25a8-1add-088e1ce2565b@petit-huguenin.org>
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2021 05:48:20 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com>, 112attendees@ietf.org
References: <6016C557-1A75-479B-AA83-4792062553C9@gmail.com> <d879cfe9-7749-8d5f-f3cb-15a8e7e1515b@cea.fr> <CAGgd1Oc1ExPD69QBtXcoxiCc-cvkcghuq3wk3+=-YQuLh1mRqw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Marc Petit-Huguenin <marc@petit-huguenin.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAGgd1Oc1ExPD69QBtXcoxiCc-cvkcghuq3wk3+=-YQuLh1mRqw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------elDVgeHFzTnCKPGLR21bg8oi"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/112attendees/QYgN4Rw0TxNeWC7SYeNSNW0RTPA>
Subject: Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup
X-BeenThere: 112attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 112 attendees <112attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/112attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:112attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2021 12:48:36 -0000
I liked be able to talk to the author without the stress of having to formulate my questions right after the presentation, so Gather was nice for that, and I would suggest to continue using the same format after fixing the slowdown when a lot of people were on the floor. I would also prefer to watch the presentations directly on Gather rather than on YouTube, after the problem of hearing other conversations is fixed. A way to show that someone is interacting with video and other Gather objects would be nice too. On 11/6/21 05:38, Deb Cooley wrote: > I liked the YouTube idea for the actual presentation. I could watch it > more than once to understand the ideas better. > > The Gather room part for discussion didn't work for me. I'd suggest going > back to Meetecho for the discussion part. It could be a two step process - > watch the YouTube videos 'session', then a Meetecho session to discuss. > > Deb Cooley > decoole@nsa.gov > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 8:37 AM Alexandre PETRESCU <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr> > wrote: > >> For the 'what should change' part - I suggest to make it work ok fully on >> IPv6. Last time I checked it worked only partially on IPv6: the sound >> quality was worse on IPv6, some buttons on left could not be clicked on >> IPv6, etc. >> >> Yours, >> >> -- >> Alexandre Petrescualexandre.petrescu@cea.fr, tél 0169089223 >> >> Le 03/11/2021 à 17:33, Aaron Falk a écrit : >> >> An update & 2 questions: >> >> *Update:* The secretariat confirms that the HotRFC “rooms” will remain up >> and available for your use through the end of the IETF next week. >> >> *Questions:* >> >> 1. Should we use Gather to do this again? >> 2. If so, what should we change? >> >> --aaron >> -- Marc Petit-Huguenin Email: marc@petit-huguenin.org Blog: https://marc.petit-huguenin.org Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug
- [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Aaron Falk
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Alexander Clemm
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Deb Cooley
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Lixia Zhang
- [112attendees] To Slack or not... Re: HotRFC Gath… Toerless Eckert
- [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gather.… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Alexa Morris
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [112attendees] HotRFC Gather followup Randy Bush
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Randy Bush
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Fred Baker
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Fred Baker
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… John C Klensin
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Randy Bush
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Christian Huitema
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Mark Andrews
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Randy Bush
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Theresa Enghardt
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gat… Michael Richardson