Re: [antitrust-policy] how does that affect those with no competitive interests?

<david.black@emc.com> Sun, 22 January 2012 23:27 UTC

Return-Path: <david.black@emc.com>
X-Original-To: antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF0721F8555 for <antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:27:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.092
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.092 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.507, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y4G4COuZQGny for <antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:27:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com (mexforward.lss.emc.com [128.222.32.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3604521F845E for <antitrust-policy@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:27:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hop04-l1d11-si01.isus.emc.com (HOP04-L1D11-SI01.isus.emc.com [10.254.111.54]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id q0MNRdLB006555 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 22 Jan 2012 18:27:39 -0500
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (mailhub.lss.emc.com [10.254.221.251]) by hop04-l1d11-si01.isus.emc.com (RSA Interceptor); Sun, 22 Jan 2012 18:27:28 -0500
Received: from mxhub24.corp.emc.com (mxhub24.corp.emc.com [128.222.70.136]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id q0MNRRLA002296; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 18:27:27 -0500
Received: from mx14a.corp.emc.com ([169.254.1.99]) by mxhub24.corp.emc.com ([128.222.70.136]) with mapi; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 18:27:26 -0500
From: david.black@emc.com
To: johnl@taugh.com, antitrust-policy@ietf.org
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 18:27:27 -0500
Thread-Topic: [antitrust-policy] how does that affect those with no competitive interests?
Thread-Index: AczZVS5Icbp4KuRYSLW2aCnMQx/g9wAB+2/PAAASwpg=
Message-ID: <4BE5CCE9-246E-4436-AA5F-1E19B095749C@mimectl>
References: <D6462734-EE5E-4FCC-8988-EB49503C87D3@mimectl>, <20120122222755.88467.qmail@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20120122222755.88467.qmail@joyce.lan>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
x-mimectl: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V8.3.105.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-EMM-MHVC: 1
Subject: Re: [antitrust-policy] how does that affect those with no competitive interests?
X-BeenThere: antitrust-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss the need for an antitrust or competition policy for the IETF." <antitrust-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/antitrust-policy>, <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/antitrust-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:antitrust-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/antitrust-policy>, <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:27:41 -0000

> I don't think "never ever talk about anything that anyone might sue
> about" is a concrete solution to anything.

I don't think that's being proposed.

OTOH, not holding discussions that violate anti-trust or competition
law seems like a good idea, and I believe your strawman proposal
includes that idea.

Thanks,
--David

________________________________
From: John Levine [johnl@taugh.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 5:27 PM
To: antitrust-policy@ietf.org
Cc: Black, David
Subject: Re: [antitrust-policy] how does that affect those with no competitive interests?

>Not exactly. Hypothetically, if an anti-trust suit were filed over a
>decision made in an IETF WG meeting, everyone in that meeting could
>find the legal system intruding into their professional lives.

That's what I summarized as Someone Might Sue.

Here in the US, that's always a hypothetical problem.  Sometimes it's
even a real one, but I don't think it's worth a lot of effort to deal
with unless we have reason to think that there is a concrete problem
that we can solve in a concrete way.

I don't think "never ever talk about anything that anyone might sue
about" is a concrete solution to anything.

R's,
John