Re: [Asrg] DNS-based Email Sender Authentication Mechanisms: a Critical Review

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 27 May 2009 21:53 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A3228C15E for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2009 14:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.078
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.078 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.262, BAYES_20=-0.74, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UKqEAnydLl4m for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2009 14:53:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [208.31.42.53]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C52FF3A6778 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 27 May 2009 14:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 19618 invoked from network); 27 May 2009 21:55:11 -0000
Received: from mail1.iecc.com (208.31.42.56) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 27 May 2009 21:55:11 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=k0905; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=ndgHEwm1f2XwY5rbBiZNAR749VKb1llyp6MctPvPdbY=; b=pGTtVeOnphinbMrSdKzfe8uPJeKXlc2VnZmwfUBzd+5uJ9Sm5GKftYX3MVUYafAYioEwSXeRtoyN6x6eqNu0DhxKlzsOEzK5h1T7GnkBHq2q0nnTwYFEAE0fzFM+l0tQjtuTq5rkijPYM69pA0+WKw3iYXJE6dLoIjJwLTHY9Mw=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=k0905; bh=ndgHEwm1f2XwY5rbBiZNAR749VKb1llyp6MctPvPdbY=; b=Wtg5iOwRYqkWUlPPYOuaGCrdzpvV3J4YQa6mTp4sIhZgyNaeKSJpc8hY1v32lgmMVNsuzHHsVkm/erJ2SjRTr2lF+Eg6j9mZoKbY2enaZcCPvCkkHkKSPn8yr1I9bKWi2yiNoC6ZkGDvaKUutwL/kofERfl6P4U61zjq/bXm/Fs=
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 21:55:10 -0000
Message-ID: <20090527215510.24321.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: asrg@irtf.org
In-Reply-To: <3be421270905240058l423fdb91wcf599f9ba270c9f1@mail.gmail.com>
Organization:
Cc:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] DNS-based Email Sender Authentication Mechanisms: a Critical Review
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 21:53:34 -0000

>Title: DNS-based Email Sender Authentication Mechanisms: a Critical Review

Dave is right -- this misunderstands what DKIM does.  The only validated
identity is the signer, which need bear no relationship to any other header
domain, e.g.

 DKIM-Signature: ... d=rbn.ru; ...
 From: Bank of America Security <security@paypal.com>

The From: header is signed, but the only domain that DKIM
authenticates here is rbn.ru.  It doesn't say anything about the
legitimacy or lack thereof of the address security@paypal.com, or of
the string "Bank of America Security" which is what a whole lot of
MUAs will actually display.

Even if the d= domain matches the domain on the From: line, it still
doesn't promise that the address is "real".  This is an important
point that a lot of people misunderstand.

R's,
John