Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no favours" (DMNF)

Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de> Fri, 05 November 2010 10:30 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8D03A680C; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 03:30:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.646
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.646 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.604, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VMfnLaEMsbsv; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 03:30:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AEFA3A680A; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 03:30:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1PEJRl-000MY4-02 for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 10:23:01 +0000
Received: from mx01.bfk.de ([193.227.124.2]) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <fweimer@bfk.de>) id 1PEJRi-000MXX-AT for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 10:22:58 +0000
Received: from mx00.int.bfk.de ([10.119.110.2]) by mx01.bfk.de with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) id 1PEJRd-0003lS-1a; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 10:22:53 +0000
Received: by bfk.de with local id 1PEJRc-0001GJ-T9; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 10:22:52 +0000
To: Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org>
Cc: IETF DNSEXT WG <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no favours" (DMNF)
References: <59023.1287939121@nsa.vix.com> <20101025094523.GA5187@nic.fr> <41281.1288025835@nsa.vix.com> <20101025233215.4A495606495@drugs.dv.isc.org> <72674.1288058394@nsa.vix.com> <AANLkTimwXkUrYHveahqTMZe=V8zu8LG1MJ3HtQEZAoDW@mail.gmail.com> <78766.1288064363@nsa.vix.com>
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 10:22:52 +0000
In-Reply-To: <78766.1288064363@nsa.vix.com> (Paul Vixie's message of "Tue\, 26 Oct 2010 03\:39\:23 +0000")
Message-ID: <8262wcm5mr.fsf@mid.bfk.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

* Paul Vixie:

>> Why doesn't that belong better in HTTP? The HTTP WG is probably better
>> placed to define whatever a "web error" is.
>
> if you get an nxdomain you won't be connecting to any web server
> anywhere.

This depends on the browser and on the domain name.  Quite a few
implement search fallback, try again with "www." prepended.
Redirection to search seems important because most users do not care
about the difference between DNS-based and search-engine-based
lookups.

-- 
Florian Weimer                <fweimer@bfk.de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH       http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100              tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe             fax: +49-721-96201-99