IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no favours" (DMNF)

Mans Nilsson <mansaxel@besserwisser.org> Mon, 25 October 2010 00:28 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E593A67DF; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 17:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id whbtx7fQFMqb; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 17:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B5BB3A677E; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 17:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1PAApf-00074u-Ky for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:22:35 +0000
Received: from paka.besserwisser.org ([192.36.115.43]) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <mansaxel@besserwisser.org>) id 1PAApc-00074H-As for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:22:32 +0000
Received: from paka.besserwisser.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by paka.besserwisser.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.7) with ESMTP id o9P0MKve009915 for <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 02:22:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from mansaxel@localhost) by paka.besserwisser.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.7/Submit) id o9P0MKpI009914 for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 02:22:20 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 02:22:20 +0200
From: Mans Nilsson <mansaxel@besserwisser.org>
To: "namedroppers@ops.ietf.org" <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no favours" (DMNF)
Message-ID: <20101025002220.GD23479@besserwisser.org>
References: <C8EA875A.83BA%roy@nominet.org.uk> <8D01F5E3-F863-4873-BB0E-654FA89983F7@virtualized.org> <AANLkTim-N5CByUnUr-aTYML_88hOxTJEsNKa=jkGaGfs@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eqp4TxRxnD4KrmFZ"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim-N5CByUnUr-aTYML_88hOxTJEsNKa=jkGaGfs@mail.gmail.com>
X-URL: http://vvv.besserwisser.org
X-Purpose: More of everything NOW!
X-happyness: Life is good.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

Subject: Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no favours" (DMNF) Date: Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 08:52:12PM -0300 Quoting Brian Dickson (brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com):
 
> At the risk of sounding facetious, I think we already have a "DMNF" bit: DO
> (plus CD bit, i.e. security-aware stub resolvers).

++;

-- 
Måns Nilsson     primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE                             +46 705 989668
Your CHEEKS sit like twin NECTARINES above a MOUTH that knows no BOUNDS --

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email