IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no favours" (DMNF)

Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org> Fri, 05 November 2010 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993A43A6874; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 08:37:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fGa9aD0wDy4K; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 08:37:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73FB3A686B; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 08:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1PEOG2-000L87-OU for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:31:14 +0000
Received: from [2001:4f8:3:bb:230:48ff:fe5a:2f38] (helo=nsa.vix.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <vixie@vix.com>) id 1PEOG0-000L7l-JU for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:31:12 +0000
Received: from nsa.vix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nsa.vix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17070A1051 for <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:31:12 +0000 (UTC)
From: Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org>
To: IETF DNSEXT WG <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no favours" (DMNF)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 05 Nov 2010 13:42:26 +0200." <19667.60834.801609.327061@guava.gson.org>
References: <59023.1287939121@nsa.vix.com> <20101025094523.GA5187@nic.fr> <41281.1288025835@nsa.vix.com> <20101025233215.4A495606495@drugs.dv.isc.org> <72674.1288058394@nsa.vix.com> <AANLkTimwXkUrYHveahqTMZe=V8zu8LG1MJ3HtQEZAoDW@mail.gmail.com> <78766.1288064363@nsa.vix.com> <8262wcm5mr.fsf@mid.bfk.de> <19667.60834.801609.327061@guava.gson.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.2; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22)
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:31:12 +0000
Message-ID: <32462.1288971072@nsa.vix.com>
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

Andreas Gustafsson <gson@araneus.fi> wrote:

> Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Redirection to search seems important because most users do not care
> > about the difference between DNS-based and search-engine-based
> > lookups.
> 
> Indeed - important enough that at least one browser is taking
> defensive measures to ensure that this redirection to search is not
> broken by NXDOMAIN spoofing:
> 
>   http://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/group/chromium-discuss/msg/5891e258e6015fc5

in the info-war over the ownership of eyeballs, we will all be collateral
victims.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email