IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no favours" (DMNF)

Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk> Sun, 24 October 2010 23:48 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F553A67D6; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 16:48:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4srbnlNBGJtL; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 16:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D443A6768; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 16:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1PAAGE-0004Nn-Ai for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 23:45:58 +0000
Received: from mx4.nominet.org.uk ([213.248.199.24]) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <roy@nominet.org.uk>) id 1PAAGB-0004NU-RR for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 23:45:56 +0000
DomainKey-Signature: s=main.dk.nominet.selector; d=nominet.org.uk; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:From:To:CC:Subject: Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=JqwUsi7i1y7G58JXtk6pUsjIu7qQZvakw/VJtF0/bXtIoL3JbSnIfoc0 ce3/AGTx4StUbrL+Y3E2xhHs9D0jwjxl/0W5QkeGi5+s+8HV67lTGo+Z1 lkEOgfPVMmTdBAT;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nominet.org.uk; i=roy@nominet.org.uk; q=dns/txt; s=main.dkim.nominet.selector; t=1287963955; x=1319499955; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Roy=20Arends=20<roy@nominet.org.uk>|Subject:=20R e:=20[dnsext]=20need=20new=20flag=20bit=20in=20EDNS,=20"d o=20me=20no=20favours"=20(DMNF)|Date:=20Sun,=2024=20Oct =202010=2023:45:49=20+0000|Message-ID:=20<C8EA91CD.83C1%r oy@nominet.org.uk>|To:=20David=20Conrad=20<drc@virtualize d.org>|CC:=20Paul=20Vixie=20<vixie@isc.org>,=20"namedropp ers@ops.ietf.org"=0D=0A=09<namedroppers@ops.ietf.org> |MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted- printable|Content-ID:=20<8115ea33-82d5-47d7-8083-5dbe814c 6422>|In-Reply-To:=20<8D01F5E3-F863-4873-BB0E-654FA89983F 7@virtualized.org>; bh=HVxT+W6hNriUkb9b71FV8XFF0A4TFiWGLgwxv4IFFvc=; b=YYxSce+EsZoaQmFa0wIvHeszmOVSyQ2yVNunKt/SXli9EuUEjW7BlyG8 mI1LT/BoXERITPYxl2+wu8cxBeu6jW83RKQPTF7fB9NjButXWzBZi79+V EQbxoISeu66RQrR;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,233,1286146800"; d="scan'208";a="22295319"
Received: from wds-exc2.okna.nominet.org.uk ([213.248.197.145]) by mx4.nominet.org.uk with ESMTP; 25 Oct 2010 00:45:53 +0100
Received: from WDS-EXC1.okna.nominet.org.uk ([fe80::1593:1394:a91f:8f5f]) by wds-exc2.okna.nominet.org.uk ([fe80::7577:eaca:5241:25d4%19]) with mapi; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:45:53 +0100
From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
CC: Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org>, "namedroppers@ops.ietf.org" <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no favours" (DMNF)
Thread-Topic: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no favours" (DMNF)
Thread-Index: AQHLc55dTSnDy88VIESkTX8lBR8dOJNQyD0A///lFgCAACdfgA==
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 23:45:49 +0000
Message-ID: <C8EA91CD.83C1%roy@nominet.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <8D01F5E3-F863-4873-BB0E-654FA89983F7@virtualized.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <8115ea33-82d5-47d7-8083-5dbe814c6422>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

On 10/25/10 1:24 AM, "David Conrad" <drc@virtualized.org> wrote:

> On Oct 24, 2010, at 4:01 PM, Roy Arends wrote:
> 
>> The end-game will be applications doing their own resolving. Real control.
>> No third party dependencies. No favors to ask.
> 
> And greatly reduced caching.

Yes, and greatly reduced impact of a spoofed cache.

> The problem with applications doing their own resolving is that the 'real
> control' implies there is someone at the other end of the application that has
> the understanding and knowledge to make use of that control.  Haven't we seen
> the implications of this approach with browsers that ask the end user whether
> or not to accept an SSL cert?

The DMNF bit is not user configurable?

Roy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email